Provincial New Democrat legislator Sue Hammell won't be re-nominated as the party's candidate in Surrey-Green Timbers without a fight. Responding to a Facebook message sent on August 21, fellow legislator Jagrup Brar's constituency assistant Ruby Bhandal confirmed she'll be running against Ms. Hammell for that nomination.

Tomorrow morning, federal Liberal British Columbia campaign co-chair Bruce Young discusses the pending election and former Grit parliamentarian Blair Wilson's decision to join the Greens. Provincial New Democrat health critic Adrian Dix joins us to talk about the Vancouver Island Health Authority's controversial audit of its communications division. And the New Democrat's Vancouver-Fairview candidate Jenn McGinn will share her thoughts on the upcoming by-election in that riding. Also on the show: our rabble-rousing panel - Chris Gainor, Eleanor Gregory, Bob Russell, Alex Tsakumis - will debate the week that was in provincial and federal politics. You can listen to Public Eye Radio outside of Victoria by logging into CFAX 1070 between 8:30 and 10:00. If you have a question for one of our guests, you can email us or leave a comment below.

Today, Republican presidential candidate John McCain named Alaska governor Sarah Palin as his running mate. But Canwest News Service is giving readers a skewed view of Ms. Palin. Because the graphic it's using of Senator McCain's vice-presidential pick (under the caption "Vogue Magazine with Alaska Governor Sarah Palin on the cover") is actually a photoshopped fake, created by the blog Kodiak Konfidential.

Earlier, we exclusively told you the Vancouver Island Health Authority - which has commissioned an audit of communications division - conducted a similar such review between March and June, 2003. But that's not what authority executive vice-president and chief operating officer Mike Conroy seemed to suggest in an earlier interview with the Times Colonist's Sandra McCulloch. Ms. McClulloch paraphrased Mr. Conroy as saying, "No similar review has taken place in recent memory." As a result, the vice-president stated, "I think it is timely that we go forward and ensure we're getting information out to all those who need it and also have effective mechanisms for soliciting input."

Earlier this month, the provincial government quietly announced it was looking for up to four communications consultants to write feature stories and backgrounders for the oil and gas commission. Among the requirements: "Working knowledge of CP style." But at least one prospective consultant didn't seem to know what that meant, asking the commission to "Please define CP style as listed on page 8 of the RFQ." The response: "CP style refers to the government-accepted format of Canadian Press Style for all public documents (ie: see Canadian Press Stylebook, 12th edition)." Hmmm...perhaps the commission should have added one more requirement to that request for proposal?

Earlier, we reported the Vancouver Island Health Authority has commissioned an audit to "seek facts as well as perceptions" in assessing its communications division's "current activity and capacity in the areas of public relations, international and external communications, community engagement and government relations." But this isn't the first time such an audit has been conducted. Between March and June, 2003, Public Eye has learned former public affairs bureau communication services assistant deputy minister Claudia Wilimovsky also reviewed the division.

This week, the Island Corridor Foundation announced volunteers will be distributing over 75,000 postcards as part of an effort to convince the Campbell administration to contribute one-third of the $103.8 million needed to upgrade the rail line. But the company operating that line isn't just counting on grassroots activism to convince the provincial governments to pony up that cash. According to British Columbia's lobbyist registry, StewartGossage Group Inc. co-founder Lecia Stewart and Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP public policy advisor Brian Smith have both registered to lobby the Liberals on behalf of Southern Railway of British Columbia Ltd.

Guess who Bear Mountain Resort staff will be supporting in Juan de Fuca during the upcoming provincial election campaign? The answer: Liberal candidate and outgoing Colwood mayor Jody Twa if the owners of that resort have anything to say about it. In an email, Amanda Robb, the executive assistant to resort president and chief executive officer Len Barrie, invites the "Bear Mountain Team" to "Jody Twa's 1st official Juan de Fuca BC Liberal campaign event" at 899 Goldstream Avenue. "Your support on September 4th would be greatly appreciated and we hope to see as many of you there as possible," she continues. Earlier, Public Eye exclusively reported Mr. Barrie had a $10,000 per plate fundraiser for the Liberals at his residence. At the time, Mr. Twa - who attended that fundraiser - declined to speak about reports he would be running for the party. The following is a complete copy of the aforementioned email.

From: Amanda Robb
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 12:04 PM
To: !ALL STAFF; !Civil Construction Management; !Construction
Cc: Len Barrie
Subject: Juan de Fuca Liberal Event
Importance: High

Hello Bear Mountain Team:

Please see the attached invite for Jody Twa’s 1st official Juan de Fuca BC Liberal campaign event.

Your support on September 4th would be greatly appreciated and we hope to see as many of you there as possible.

Location and information noted on invite.

Sincerely,

amanda robb executive assistant to president/ceo & investor relations liaison

bear mountain resort
208-2800 bryn maur road victoria, bc canada v9b 3t4
tel 250.391.3799 fax 250.474.8851 mobile 250.893.0745

victoria’s luxury mountainside resort > bearmountain.ca

Last week, your humble organ finished teaching a course in investigative journalism at the University of Victoria. So we're going to take the next few days off to do some marking and enjoy the last week of August. Which means postings may be somewhat sporadic until Friday.

Last week, in an interview with Public Eye, Vision Vancouver nomination candidate Thomas Lockhart complained, "I just did an article with Sandra Thomas from The Vancouver Courier and during the hour-long conversation I never once mentioned guns or firearms. And yet she peppered the entire thing with references to guns and firearms." But that's not how Ms. Thomas remembers their conversation.

In an email to 24 hours, the reporter writes, "Lockhart made several references to guns and asked that if I were to mention his hobby, that I refer to his guns as 'firearms.' I also did not 'pepper' the article with references to guns and mentioned his hobby just once in a sentence that reads, 'Lockhart and Gregson also share a love of Harley Davidson motorcycles and both are big firearm enthusiasts.'"

Last week, the provincial Conservatives promised to announce their Vancouver-Fairview by-election candidate on Sunday at the New India Buffet and Restaurant. But it seems party leader Wilf Hanni was being a bit of a tease. Because that announcement is now being made today at the Holiday Inn Vancouver Centre. The following is a complete copy of that media advisory.

MEDIA ADVISORY

Vancouver - The Leader’s Office of the BC Conservative Party wishes to inform you that our Party Leader, Wilf Hanni will hold a News Conference on Monday, August 25th, to make an announcement of significant importance regarding politics in the Province of British Columbia.

The News Conference will be held at 10:00 A.M. on Monday, August 25th

in the East Ballroom at the
HOLIDAY INN VANCOUVER CENTRE
711 West Broadway
Vancouver, B.C.

Tomorrow morning, on Public Eye Radio, lawyer Hassan Fancy and Viva Consulting Family Life Inc. co-founder Sol Boxenbaum discuss the class action lawsuits that have been launched against Loto Quebec and the Ontario Gaming and Lottery Corp. Provincial Conservative leader Wilf Hanni discusses whether he'll be running in the Vancouver-Fairview by-election. And our rabble-rousing panel - Don Anderson, Eleanor Gregory, Bob Russell, Alex Tsakumis - will debate the week that was in provincial and federal politics. You can listen to Public Eye Radio outside of Victoria by logging into CFAX 1070 between 8:30 and 10:00. If you have a question for one of our guests, you can email us or leave a comment below.

Here at Public Eye, we know some of our readers may have strong feelings about our reportage from time to time. For example, yesterday, Vision Vancouver parks board nomination candidate Thomas Lockhart said, "What can I say. You don't have to publish it. But, if you're going to be an asshole, you're going to ruin my political career." This, in response to questions about an account of his grenade-throwing experience in Cambodia. So now is your opportunity share those feelings anonymously. Because, today, 24 hours's online poll is asking this question: "Is 24 hours reporter Sean Holman an a--hole?"

Earlier, we reported Vancouver-Burrard provincial New Democrat constituency association president Jenn McGinn - who has been thinking about making a bid to be the party's by-election candidate in Vancouver-Fairview - would be announcing some "exciting news" today at Flying Wedge Pizza. And what will that exciting news be, you may wonder? Well, coincidentally, New Democrat leader Carole James will also be at there at the same time to "introduce the NDP's official candidate for the Vancouver-Fairview by-election." This, according to a media advisory distributed by the party this morning. The following is a complete copy of that advisory.

NEWSWIRE

James to announce NDP candidate for by-election today

BC NDP
Media Advisory
August 22, 2008

JAMES TO ANNOUNCE NDP CANDIDATE FOR BY-ELECTION TODAY

VANCOUVER - BC NDP Leader Carole James will introduce the NDP’s official candidate for the Vancouver-Fairview by-election this morning.

WHEN:
10:00 am
Friday, August 22

WHERE:
Flying Wedge Pizza
3499 Cambie Street (at 19th)

-30-

For more information, please call David Bieber at 604-430-8600 local 254 or 604-809-7504

Back in June, the Campbell administration appointed Sheldon Stoilen to the BC Ferry Commission. According to the board resourcing and development office, Mr. Stoilen has "previously held various senior positions with Canadian Airlines International, including Senior Vice President of Marketing and Commercial Services." But what that biography doesn't mention is the fact he was the marketing and sales vice-president for Harmony Airways - the now defunct airline once run by former Liberal finance minister Gary Collins. Asked for comment, provincial New Democrat ferries and ports critic Gary Coons said, "The minister, on numerous occassions, has expressed how the independence of the commission will drive the Coastal Ferry Act. And I'm sure some may question whether the independence will be effected now that we have someone like Sheldon Stoilen in there."

Of course, this isn't the first time Harmony Airways employees have been the receipients of government patronage. Earlier, Public Eye exclusively told you about the appointment of Haydn Acheson as a Law Society of British Columbia lay bencher and Graham Whitmarsh as the head of the premier's climate action secretariat.

Earlier, we reported Vancouver-Burrard provincial New Democrat constituency association president Jenn McGinn was considering making a bid to be the party's by-election candidate in Vancouver-Fairview. And now Jamie Lee Hamilton reports Ms. McGinn has invited her to attend an information meeting tomorrow at Flying Wedge Pizza to find out about her "exciting news." Whatever could it be?

This week, tattoo artist Thomas Lockhart - the long-time partner of school trustee Sharon Gregson - announced he would be seeking a Vision Vancouver parks board nomination. But his bid for elected office might not be without controversy. An example: last year, during a visit to Cambodia, Mr. Lockhart visited an army base. And he sent this account of his experience to a friend: "I have to admit, nothing quite makes your asshole pucker like playing around with live hand grenades. I wasn't expecting that snap of the initial fuse (you can see me jump .... it sets of a 5 second delay acid fuse that ignites about a pound of explosives. A lot of those 3rd world Com Block nations (Vietnam, China) will also allow you use their military facilities .... for a price. For two hundred bucks you can fire off a rocket launcher ..... and for another 300 the wankers will even supply a cow.”

In an interview with Public Eye, Mr. Lockhart - a competitive shooter and firearm enthusiast - said he and Ms. Gregson took a trip to Cambodia and Vietnam in 2007. "And they have a lot of ammunitions left over from the Vietnam War and their own civil strife. And that's how the army makes money. You go down to the army bases there and they give you training courses on how to fire military weapons. And one of the places down there in Cambodia - Phnom Penh - they also had grenades there. Well, wouldn't you take a course on how to throw grenades? I did anyway."

"You've got to keep it in context," continued Mr. Lockhart, who has practiced at shooting ranges around the world, including ones in Australia, the Philippines, South Africa, Thailand and Zimbabwe. "That was under the instruction of a bunch of military officers. You know, I admit it. I just did an article with Sandra Thomas from The Vancouver Courier and during the hour-long conversation I never once mentioned guns or firearms. And yet she peppered the entire thing with references to guns and firearms. It is one of my sports. But it's not my entire life. The media seems to grab onto this and make such a big stink - same with Sharon - about guns."

Mr. Lockhart added the email, which was posted on actor Leo Chiang's blog, was supposed to have been "private." The posting also included a video clip of the prospective parks board candidate throwing a grenade into a pond. Both were removed from the blog following our conversation with Mr. Lockhart.

Offered an opportunity to explain his words and actions to Vision Vancouver members who might take offence to his grenade-throwing email, Mr. Lockhart said, "What can I say. You don't have to publish it. But, if you're going to be an asshole, you're going to ruin my political career. And, of course, I'm going to really appreciate that."

News of Mr. Lockhart's impending candidacy was first reported by Vancouver Magazine's Frances Bula.

Back in June, Attorney General Wally Oppal's ministerial assistant Michael Harrison departed the precincts to join Ascent Public Affairs Inc. But it seems his stint as a lobbyist didn't last that long. Because he's returned to the Rockpile as a senior aide to Finance Minister Colin Hansen. Fancy that!

The provincial government has hired an independent consultant to review Community Living British Columbia's service delivery model, Public Eye has exclusively learned. The review, which was requested by Treasury Board, was "set to commence in mid-May, with a final report anticipated by the end of September" - although the housing and social development ministry is now expecting that report by the end of October. But don't expect Queenswood Consulting Ltd.'s review to comment on the government's recent decision to give the authority the right to deny services to developmentally disabled adults with IQs over 70. According to the ministry, the company hasn't been tasked to investigate the government agency's eligibility criteria or mandate. The following is a complete copy of the project summary for that review.

Review of Community Living British Columbia
Service Delivery Model and Policy Tools

Project Summary

The Ministry for Children and Family Development (MCFD) working in partnership with Community Living B.C. (CLBC) has commissioned an independent, third party to review identified aspects of CLBC’s service delivery model and policy tools. The third party review will be conducted by Queenswood Consulting Group Ltd., in accordance with the following terms of reference:

1. The purpose of the review is to consider and assess CLBC’s service delivery model and policy tools, with particular attention to:
a. Identifying changes in service delivery since CLBC’s establishment
b. Continued development of innovative and flexible service delivery options that provide choice for families and individuals;
c. The degree to which long term planning can bring consistency in approach and expectation to service delivery.

2. The third party will undertake the following tasks in the course of its review:
a. Conduct a targeted stakeholder consultation process and provide a summary of feedback and key findings;
b. Consider CLBC’s service delivery structure; policy and program direction; financial status; and policy tools;
c. Assess the long-term objectives of CLBC’s Service Strategic and Operational plans;
d. Conduct a jurisdictional review; and
e. Identify options with associated strengths and risks for moving forward.

3. The main deliverable of this review will be a report that builds on information arising from targeted consultation sessions, interviews, and internal and jurisdictional reviews, to provide recommendations on potential directions with respect to:

a. Continuation of the development of innovative and flexible service delivery options that provide choice for families and individuals;
b. Guardianship functions within the context of the service delivery model; and
c. Long term approach to planning for service delivery changes.

4. The review will commence in mid-May, with a final report anticipated by the end of September, 2008.

Earlier, we reported provincial Conservative leader Wilf Hanni was considering running in the Vancouver-Fairview by-election. But is he actually going to put his name on the ballot? Well, we'll find out this coming Sunday at the New India Buffet and Restaurant. Because that's where his party will be kicing off their by-election campaign and introducing their candidate. This, according to an advertisment placed in 24 hours. The following is a complete copy of that ad.

You are invited to attend a
BC CONSERVATIVE PARTY LUNCHEON

To kick off the
Vancouver-Fairview By-election Campaign

Date and Time: Sunday, August 24th at 1:00 pm
Location: NEW INDIA BUFFET & RESTAURANT
805 West Broadway, Vancouver
Cost: $20 per ticket

Feature Speaker:
BC Conservative Party Leader Wilf Hanni

Our Vancouver-Fairview Candidate will be introduced at the luncheon

The provincial government has promised the yes and no sides in British Columbia's upcoming referendum on electoral reform will each receive $500,000. And, according to proposed regulations released earlier this month, the money could be split among up to five groups on either side. But neither the pro- nor anti-single transferable vote forces are pleased with that arrangement. In a joint letter sent to the ministry of attorney general, Fair Voting BC and Know STV representatives Bruce Hallsor and David Schreck write, "We believe that it is essential that the government recognize, through its funding formula, one clear leadership group on each side which can become a focus for media coverage."

The reason: "This is an important public issue, and we know from experience, both in British Columbia and in other provinces, that it quickly becomes confused if the media begin to pick and choose from a multiplicity of voices on each side."

In their letter, Messrs. Hallsor and Schreck also argue the yes and no sides should be able to fund polling, travel and staff expenses using donated funds - something the government's proposed regulations wouldn't allow. The following is a complete copy of that letter.

***

A Joint Submission from Fair Voting BC and Know STV
c/o Bruce Hallsor
800, 1070 Douglas Street
Victoria, B.C.
V8W 2S8
19 August 2008

Strategic Planning and Legislation Office
Ministry of Attorney General
PO Box 9283 Stn Prov Govt
Victoria BC V8W 9J7

Dear Sirs:

Re: Consultation on Regulating Funding for Electoral Reform referendum Proponents and Opponents

We are writing to you jointly as leaders of the pro-STV and anti-STV forces in British Columbia.

David Schreck is authorized to sign on behalf of Know STV, the only significant group to campaign against STV in 2005. Bruce Hallsor is president of Fair Voting BC, a group which has advocated for proportional representation since 1997, and which now unites all the significant pro-STV groups from 2005. Bruce Hallsor was also a co-chair of the Yes to STV Campaign in 2005.

Although we disagree about the best choice of voting system for British Columbia, we are agreed on the need for a clear and focused public debate, and wish to see the public funds already committed to this project spent effectively rather than dissipated through a confused and muddled process.

Specifically, we are agreed on the following points.

(1) We both believe there should be one recognized yes and no campaign, to receive all the funds. We believe that this measure is crucial to ensure that there is a meaningful and well-publicized debate. In 2005, although groups tried to establish themselves as the leading voices for Yes and No respectively, the media did not recognize any group or individual as having a legitimate leadership role. Media coverage of the referendum was thus very different from media coverage of the parallel election, in which the party leaders were clear spokespeople for their parties. We believe that it is essential that the government recognize, through its funding formula, one clear leadership group on each side which can become a focus for media coverage.

If the government is not willing to accept this scenario, funding should be weighted to applicants with a province wide focus, and should not be distributed randomly or by chance, but by some pre-established logical criteria.

(2) We both believe that while the province may restrict how the funds are spent, they should not restrict recipients from raising money separately for other purposes, such as polling, travel expenses, paying salaries, or any other purpose. It is obvious that $500,000 is not adequate for conducting a province-wide campaign. It represents less than 20 cents per eligible voter, not even enough to reach each voter once by bulk mail.

Political parties raise and spend far more than this in order to communicate with the voters. Similarly, the pro-STV campaign and the anti-STV campaign will each need to raise additional money in order to campaign effectively.

In the interest of public debate, they should be encouraged to do so, not have their hands tied behind their backs.

(3) We both believe that recipients should be entitled to pay for the administrative expense of administering the funds out of the funds, including paying the official agent.

(4) We both believe that releasing a discussion paper in August, with less than one month to respond, is not adequate, and request an extension on the time to respond. We will be very surprised if the government receives many substantive replies from members of the public in the time allowed.

(5) We both believe that recognized proponents and opponents should have access to the voters list, with the same rights and restrictions as political parties have. Like most of our other recommendations, this will be easier to arrange and to monitor if the number of proponent and opponent groups is limited to one of each.

We strongly urge the government to begin thinking in terms of creating a clear public debate by recognizing a single group on each side. This is an important public issue, and we know from experience, both in Britiwsh Columbia and in other provinces, that it quickly becomes confused if the media begin to pick and choose from a multiplicity of voices on each side.

Imagine if there were six recognized pro-STV groups and each one gave a different key reason for British Columbians to vote in favour of STV. In such a scenario, what exactly would a vote for STV mean? There would be no shortage of people, from all sides, eager to give their own conflicting interpretations.

This debate is important. It would be tragic indeed if we emerged from this process on May 13th with no clear outcome and nobody able to agree on who had voted for what, or on the significance of the result. There is still time to ensure that this does not happen.

Yours truly

David Schreck
Know STV

Bruce Hallsor
Fair Voting BC

Last month, Vision Vancouver announced its nomination meeting for council, park and school board candidates would be held on September 20. But civic association members will also have an opportunity to cast their nomination ballots during an advanced poll scheduled for September 15. At least, that's what candidates were told last Friday.

Looking for a euphemism to describe the provincial Liberal party? Well, it seems the Canadian Federation of Independent Business has come up with one. Because their new British Columbia affairs director Brian Bonney isn't described as the Liberal's former operations director. He's described as having recently been "Director of Operations with a large membership based organization." Er, okay.

Gregor Robertson may no longer be a provincial New Democrat legislator. But that's hasn't stopped the Vision Vancouver mayoral candidate from asking his supporters to donate money to the New Democrats. In a thank-you letter to those supporters, Mr. Robertson writes, "A Vancouver-Fairview by-election could be called any day and I hope you will join with me to work toward victory in that race." Specifically, Mr. Robertson states, "There are several ways that you can help immediately" - including a "one-time contribution towards the by-election campaign." So here's a question for our readers: how will Mr. Robertson's federal Liberal backers - some of whom might not support the New Democrats - feel about that fundraising pitch?

We are many
When we stand together, we can win

August 7th, 2008

Dear New Democrat,

Thank you for your incredible support over the last three years.

Your active involvement means so much to me personally, as it does to every elected representative of our Party. The ideas, volunteer work and support provided by people like you, both in Vancouver-Fairview and throughout Greater Vancouver, are a real testatment to the strength of our communities.

As you know, I have been nominated as a candidate for mayor. The decision to step down as an MLA and take the flight for our issues to the local level was a difficult one.

There are obvious differences between local and provincial politics, but for me the goal is the same: to ensure that everyone - including the most vulnerable among us - has an opportunity to achieve their potential, to restore the health of our environment, and to transform our economy to respect the core principles of sustainability. We need governments at all levels that listen and treat people with respect.

A Vancouver-Fairview by-election could be called any day and I hope you will join with me to work toward victory in that race.

We need to start working now in order to be ready. We must all do our part and work together as we have done so successfully in the past. Your ideas, volunteer time and financial support - starting now - will be essential to this effort.

We live here. We work here. This is our home. We have a right to know what's going on. And we must continue to raise a progressive voice for Vancouver-Fairview after the by-election.

In our constituency, we've witnessed first-hand the struggle of Cambie Street businesses faced with bankruptcy and the erosion of affordable housing. Our community has a growing number of homeless people, many of them very young.

Our province has the highest level of child poverty in Canada. Families are waiting longer and longer for health care for their loved ones. Higher education and the opportunities it can bring have been priced out of reach for many young people.

The first priority in a healthy democracy is to look after the common good. Defending the public interest is what governments are supposed to do. It's what they're elected to do.

In this view, I introduced two private member's bills in the Legislature to lift the veil of secrecy and protect the public interest: The Right to Know Act and the Toxics Reduction Act.

Research shows that 6,000 Canadians are actively poisoned by toxic pesticides every year. Half of the victims are children under 6 years old. Pollutants also cause up to 25,000 deaths, 24,000 new cases of cancer and 2,500 low birth-weight babies in Canada every year. In addition to the personal tragedy, this adds up to $9.1 billion to health care costs.

I believe people have a right to know what's in their food. Communities have a right to know about their exposure to toxic substances and the potential harm from that exposure. Government has a responsibility to protect people from the harmful effects of poisons and toxins.

That is in the public interest. That is looking after the common good. Unfortunately there's been no movement on this and many other important issues facing us.

Again, I cannot say how much I appreciate the support you have given me and our Party. You are one of the people who helps breathe new life into our province. Your participation, tireless activism and financial contributions are helping to create a more just and equitable society for everyone in British Columbia.

We are many. When we stand together, we can win.

Thank you so much.

Warmest personal regards,

Gregor Robertson

P.S. - The by-election could be called at any time. Please take the time today to buy your ticket(s), send a donation to the by-election campaign, sign up as a volunteer, or even all three if you can. We must begin today, and the earlier we hear from you the more effective our campaign will be. Thanks again.

***

We need to elect a strong progressive voice for Vancouver-Fairview. I am confident that we will.

I ask for your moral support, and if possible, your financial contribution towards this campaign.

There are several ways that you can help immediately...

First, you can make a one-time contribution towards the by-election campaign. Any amount you can afford - whether it's $1,000, $100 or another amount - will be very helpful and gratefully received. Remember, your contributions are tax receiptable!

Second, volunteers are hard at work putting together our plans for the by-election. The next event is a reception at Figment Restaurant, at 12th and Cambie in Vancouver, on Wednesday, Aughust 20th. I hope to see you there so I will have the opportunity to thank you personally for all that you do for our movement. The tickets are $200, with proceeds to the by-election campaign. Details can be found online at www.bcndp.ca.

Third, the strength of our Party is people. I know that time is precious these days, but any time you can give to the campaign would be a tremendous boost. We have openings for people with all levels of experience. The by-election is a great opportunity to refresh skills and learn new techniques as we build toward victory in 2009.

Last week, the Campbell administration revealed would be planting four million trees in urban areas as part of a $10 million initiative to "provide opportunities for every community in BC to help sequester carbon." But the planting of those trees might not have as much impact on the province's greenhouse gas emissions as you would think. According to the government's own climate action plan, "a single large, mature tree can absorb more than 20 kilograms of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere every year." That means, by the time the government's Trees for Tomorrow seeds growup, they'll be absorbing 80,000 tonnes of carbon annually. By comparison, according to Environment Canada, Duke Energy Corp.'s Fort Nelson Gas Plant emmitted 1,895,602 tonnes of that greenhouse gas in 2004.

Last month, former provincial Liberal backbencher Richard Stewart announced he would be running against incumbent Maxine Wilson to be mayor of Coqutilam. And, according to Mr. Stewart's Facebook profile, that campaign has an unlikely endorser - former New Democrat legislator Tim Stevenson. Writing on his wall, Mr. Stevenson stated, "I'll be right there for you. No problem. I'm rooting for you. You're the man. You're the one. Etc., etc..........Go get her tiger." Asked about that comment, the Vancouver councillor explained, "It's a bit of joke....I haven't ever ventured into other people's municipalities. So I'm sort of reticent to do that. But he and I have joked for quite a long time about him running to beat Maxime. And I have always said, 'Just send me a cheque. And I'll fill it out for you.' But I didn't mean literally on the cheque part either."

So would Mr. Stevenson actually endorse Mr. Stewart? "Well, from what I know of him, he's a pretty good guy. But I really don't know. The only thing I ever see of her is at Metro meetings. And I don't know him at all outside of official regional meetings. I don't know him. But he seems like a fairly decent guy. And I know there's a lot of discontent with Maxime among the councillors."

Earlier, we wondered whether Jessica McDonald could become the highest paid provincial civil service head in Canada. But it turns out Alberta's executive council deputy minister Ron Hicks beats her out. Under the Campbell administration's new compensation framework, Ms. McDonald may make up to $313,740 - receiving additional $34,860 for a total of $348,600 if all her executives achieve their performance measures. By contrast, Alberta corporate human resources director Annette Bidniak stated in an email sent last Friday that Mr. Hicks has a base salary of $317,085. And he can receive a performance bonus of up to 35 percent for a total of $428,064.75. Meanwhile, Ontario coroporate issues management analyst Alan Cairns confirmed McGuinty administration cabinet secretary Shelly Jamieson makes $288,400, receiving a performance bonus of up to 20 percent for a total of $346,080.

Last week, Vancouver-Fairview provincial Liberal nomination candidate Margaret MacDiarmid told us she does "believe in a strong publicly funded healthcare system. I do. Absolutely. And I can't imagine a scenario where that would change." This, in reaction to an earlier report that she told August 2005 Canadian Medical Association annual general meeting delegates that rejecting private healthcare would be "closing the door to exploring new options for meeting some of those many shocking unmet needs." Nevertheless, chances are some public healthcare advocates will be raising their eyebrows when they find out controversial Canadian Medical Association president and Cambie Surgical Centre founder Brian Day attended Dr. MacDiarmid's campaign launch reception.

The Vancouver Island Health Authority's communications division will soon be getting some solicited advice. According to documents posted last week on BC Bid, the "over the past number of years, demands on the Division have increased." So the authority is commissioning a communications audit to "seek facts as well as perceptions" in assessing the division's "current activity and capacity in the areas of public relations, international and external communications, community engagement and government relations." No word on whether the audit will also assess the division's capacity for circumventing freedom of information requests. The following is a complete copy of the relevant portion of that request for proposal.

A. REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSE

1. VIHA SITUATION/OVERVIEW

The Vancouver Island Health Authority is one of six provincial health authorities established by the Government of British Columbia in 2002. Through a network of 138 hospitals, clinics, centres, health units, and residential facilities, the Vancouver Island Health Authority (VIHA) provides health care to over 752,000 people (17% of BC’s population) on Vancouver Island, on the islands of the Georgia Strait, and in the mainland communities north of Powell River and south of Rivers Inlet. More than 17,000 VIHA health care professionals, technicians, and support staff provide excellent care and services to people living within our region. As well, contracted service partners provide direction health services and support to people across the health authority. VIHA’s annual budget is $1.6 billion.

VIHA’s Five-Year Strategic Plan sets the overall direction for future health service delivery as the organization moves toward a vision of a single, full-integrated organization that provides the best care and service to VIHA residents, no matter where they live or how they access our health care system. The Ministry of Health Services works together with BC’s health authorities to provide quality, appropriate and timely health services to British Columbians.

VIHA’s Communications Division is currently comprised of 13 staff located across the Island (organization chart, Appendix B) and provides a variety of communications services to the organization in support of VIHA’s overall goals and objectives. Over the past number of years, demands on the Division have increased. VIHA is committed to improving communications with its key stakeholders – both internal and external. In order to assess the effectiveness of current communication practices and develop a baseline for future assessment, a communication audit will be undertaken.

2. PROJECT SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS

The proponent will conduct a strategic communications audit to assess terms of current activity and capacity in the areas of public relations, internal and external communications, community engagement and government relations. The goal of the audit is to seek facts as well as perceptions, and from these to propose recommendations that will ensure improved management of communications. The audit will be a systematic assessment, both formal and informal, of VIHA’s capacity for and performance of, essential communications practices. At the conclusion of the audit, the proponent will develop, in conjunction with VIHA Communications staff, a comprehensive 3-year communications strategic plan and operational plan, which incorporates all aspects of internal and external communications and is focused on strengthening VIHA’s communications strategies and programs.

The audit and subsequent report are requested to be completed by November 28, 2008.

The proponent will also provide ongoing consultancy support to the CEO and the Executive Team under terms to be mutually agreed on the basis of a “call off” contract for a three year term with a discretionary renewal term of one year.

2.3 RELATED CONSIDERATIONS

The audit will include reviewing existing results of focus groups, and surveys, as well as conducting new research with internal and external stakeholders. The audit will also include an assessment of the effectiveness and credibility of current communication vehicles and media, including publications, web site, intranet, town meetings, face-to-face communication, and other communication media.
2.4 OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The proponent will be an individual or group with significant demonstrated experience in providing successful public relations and strategic consulting advice to a major public sector organization in BC or Western Canada, ideally in a health care environment.

Tomorrow morning, on Public Eye Radio, The Tyee's Monte Paulsen and Vancouver Magazine's Frances Bula discuss the provincial significance of Vision Vancouver. Work Less Party founder Conrad Schmidt shares his thoughts on a proposed four-day work week for Nova Scotia government employees. And our rabble-rousing panel - Don Anderson, Bob Russell, Alex Tsakumis and Allan Warnke - will debate the week that was in provincial and federal politics. You can listen to Public Eye Radio outside of Victoria by logging into CFAX 1070 between 8:30 and 10:00. If you have a question for one of our guests, you can email us or leave a comment below.

Chances are, most provincial civil servants aren't too enthusiastic about the Campbell administration's decision to dramatically increase the maximum payable salaries for deputy ministers. After all, according to the British Columbia Government and Service Employees' Union, "with the increase, a deputy minister makes more than six times as much as the average government employee." But, in a briefing note posted on the public service intranet, the administration offered this explanation to bureaucrats wondering why they aren't getting similar salary increases: "Well, non-executive pay levels are linked to the collective agreement and the current agreement is in place until 2010. Executive compensation is determined by cabinet, so it’s a different process."

"Naturally, we’d all like some more money. Who wouldn’t? But when you look at the market competitiveness of what we offer vs. other public service employers, as a general rule there is nothing like the disparity there was in executive pay. There are a couple of areas where there is a gap, like sheriffs and corrections staff, although they are not out of step to the same degree as executive levels. But in most cases the BC Public Service offers pay levels competitive with other public services. That doesn’t mean we will always be competitive with the private sector as well, although in many cases we do well on that scale too." The following is a complete copy of that note.

***

Briefing Note
Some Things to Know About Executive Pay
Straight Talk on Life in the Public Service

Last week it was announced that cabinet approved some changes to the compensation framework for public service executives. In plain language, that means that deputy and assistant deputy ministers potential maximum pay went up. As these things often do, the decision set off a fair bit of media coverage. Some of what was reported was a little inaccurate, so we wanted to take this opportunity to clarify a few points.

Yes, we are talking about some substantial increases. But the key thing is that these are increases to the maximum potential salary for DM and ADM positions – not to what DMs and ADMs are getting paid right now. Raising the upper threshold doesn’t mean they all get an instant raise of any magnitude and it certainly doesn’t mean they are all getting that maximum.

In fact, very few DMs and ADMs were earning the maximum at the old levels. And none of them have actually received any increase yet – including Jessica McDonald, deputy minister to the Premier. The salary of each DM and ADM is now going to be reviewed based on their individual roles, responsibilities and performance. So individual increases will range and won’t necessarily be in the same magnitude as the increase to the maximums.

Why such large bumps to the executive maximums? Well, it’s really about staying competitive with what is offered by other public service employers in Canada and other public sector employers in B.C. Before this change, we ranked 10th for ADM salaries and 6th for DM salaries among the provinces and the federal government. With these changes, we will rank third in both categories. And even with these changes, you’ll still find most DMs below the top 50 on a list of the highest paid public sector execs in B.C. The goal isn’t to have the highest paid by any means, but rather to make sure salaries are competitive enough to recruit and retain the people we have and need to lead the public service.

And what about the rest of us? Well, non-executive pay levels are linked to the collective agreement and the current agreement is in place until 2010. Executive compensation is determined by cabinet, so it’s a different process. Naturally, we’d all like some more money. Who wouldn’t? But when you look at the market competitiveness of what we offer vs. other public service employers, as a general rule there is nothing like the disparity there was in executive pay. There are a couple of areas where there is a gap, like sheriffs and corrections staff, although they are not out of step to the same degree as executive levels. But in most cases the BC Public Service offers pay levels competitive with other public services. That doesn’t mean we will always be competitive with the private sector as well, although in many cases we do well on that scale too.

You’re entitled to your own opinion on this whole issue, of course, and you’re welcome to share your thoughts through the comments section. But we thought we’d try to ensure some of the key facts and background were clear. Truth is, this reflects some of the challenges we face as we continue forging ahead with the Corporate HR Plan and try to make the BC Public Service more competitive. That work isn’t always going to mean doing everything for everyone. It often will mean doing what’s needed in key areas to remain competitive. Sometimes those actions will apply to executives, sometimes to managers, sometimes to frontline staff, sometimes to everyone. Those actions aren’t always easy or popular, but when they need to be taken they should be taken if that’s what is required to build the future workforce we’re going to need to do the work that’s expected of us all.

Former deputy transportation minister Dan Doyle must be a busy man these days. In addition to being charged with implementing the pharamceutical task force's recommendations, he's also "responsible for the $580 million development and construction of the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games venues." This, as the Olympic organizing committee's constructive executive vice-president. According to Mr. Doyle's biography, "Whenever possible" the trained civil engineer "indulges in his longtime woodworking hobby. Travel is also a passion." But he likely won't have much time for those distractions over the coming months.

David Morel and Dan Doyle's responsibility for implementing the pharamceutical task force's controversial recommendations made seem curious to some. After all, Mr. Morel is the tenure and revenue executive director at the forests and range ministry. And Mr. Doyle is the former deputy transportation ministry. But, in an email to Public Eye, health communications director Michelle Stewart begged to differ. "With respect, it is not uncommon to see public servants moving across ministries to assist with significant public policy issues. David and Dan are part of a broader team of individuals involved with the implementation of the Task Force recommendations including individuals with direct health care/PharmaCare experience including Craig Knight, Assistant Deputy Minister of Corporate Policy, Legislation and Intergovernmental Affairs, Gordon Cross, Executive Director of Finance, and Paul Gudaitis, Executive Director of Stakeholder and Partner Relations with the PharmaCare division. In addition, a broad range of stakeholders well-versed in the field are informing the process."

Moreover, wrote Ms. Stewart, "The Task Force recommendations relate to (among other things) changes in procurement practices and activities, organizational management and stakeholder engagement processes - issues which are arguably better facilitated by someone who is not strongly identified with the subject. Two of the recommendations stemming from the Task Force contemplate a negotiation or consultation process that would address new price and reimbursement arrangements for generic products. David and Dan would specifically be involved in developing a framework for those discussions. David is a highly experienced public servant with an economics background, while Dan is a leading expert on public sector procurement and their skills are entirely applicable to the work at hand."

Last week, we exclusively told you former British Columbia Medical Association president Margaret MacDiarmid would be running for the provincial Liberal nomination in Vancouver-Fairview. But why has she chosen to make a bid for public office? Well, in an interview with Public Eye, Dr. MacDiarmid explained, when she became an association board member in 1996, much of what she did "was government relations with respect to patient care, health promotion, health policy. And I got more and more involved with that and I ended up as president. It was sometime during that year that I started thinking about what I had learned how to do. So I had learned how to, I guess, be a leader. I learned how to do public speaking and be a much more powerful advocate I think. I learned a lot more about health policy. And I had gotten to the point where, instead of being somewhat of a critic and sometimes a harsh critic of government, I actually respected what they were doing and thought, 'You know what, with the skills I have and the interests I have I would actually like to go and be part of government.'"

That was in 2006. And towards the end of her presidency, in 2007, that "kernel of an idea grew into, 'Yes, I really think I want to do this.'" So Dr. MacDiarmid spoke with Premier Gordon Campbell and then economic development minister Colin Hansen in August and September of that year "about the job, what it was like - the good, the bad and the ugly. And I did say to the premier that I would like to run in May 2009 if there was an opportunity for me."

But three weeks later, Dr. MacDiarmid was diagnosed with breast cancer. "I was totally out of it. I had work lined up - some really interesting things I was going to do. I would have gotten more involved in the party. And I would have done a whole lot of things. But, instead, I did surgery, chemo and radiation."

Dr. MacDiarmid said she eventually became well enough to consider running again. But, by that time, "the landscape had changed. People were in ridings. The Liberals have to plan for the next election. That's what they must do to have the best possible team. So I found out there was an opportunity (in Vancouver-Fairview) where there was a nomination. There was one person (running for that nomination) but it wasn't by any means over. And, as I said, not only is it eight blocks from where we live but it's also the riding where the BCMA is. So that's where my work has been in Vancouver. And that's where all my places are. It's the neighbourhood we shop in, eat, go to the dentist, doctor, my church. All those things are in the riding. And it's a lovely, diverse, beautiful place to live."

Asked what she would do if she became a legislator, Dr. MacDiarmid responded, "My top area of interest is education. And I think some people were surprised to hear that. I'm always going to have been a doctor with 23 years of being a doctor. So it's not like I would suddenly lose interest in health."

But, during the course of her practice, Dr. MacDiarmid said she saw many patients whose health problems could be have been averted or alleviated if "they could have had a good education from the beginning - and I'm talking about literacy issues, I'm talking about opportunities for early education, as well as post-secondary training. I'm not talking about everybody going to medical school. But having work you like or love makes a huge difference to the quality of your life and inevitably your health. So I would be sitting there and thinking, 'I can't really help this person. But, if we had done something from the beginning, they probably wouldn't even be in my office right now.'"

So does she have any specific education policies she'll be proposing? "I think there's already really great direction now. And I couldn't pretend to understand all the Liberal policy or be articulate on all the Liberal policy now. I know there are a number of intiatives underway. And I know literacy is one of the things that has great value put on it and efforts are being made to improving it because we still have a problem with that. But what I would do - if I was elected and I get to be a Liberal MLA - I would be asked to do what I'm asked to do and I would do it."

"So, regardless of where my interest lies, I'm going to have to become more familiar with all Liberal policies much more in-depth than I am now and then do what I'm asked to do. And what I'm asked to do might be to go and be the best MLA you can for Vancouver-Fairview. And that's what I'll do. I think the premier looks at the skill set of everyone that he has in caucus and uses those skills to the best of their ability. And I think, when you say you're going to sign-on, you don't decide here's what I want to do. I mean, you can express - and I have already expressed to him - this is what interests me the most. But he might pick me to do something different. And I bet you I'll find it fascinating."

Finally, Dr. MacDiarmid addressed concerns surrounding a report she told the August 2005 Canadian Medical Association annual general meeting that rejecting private healthcare would be "closing the door to exploring new options for meeting some of those many shocking unmet needs."

"I felt that if we couldn't, as physicians, have a dialogue about healthcare and the healthcare systems where could you? I think my concern at the time was that the debate was kind of being shutdown in the way that I think it's often shutdown in the public as well where people use certain phrases just to cut off conversation," she explained.

"I do believe in a strong publicly funded healthcare system. I do. Absolutely. And I can't imagine a scenario where that would change. I've just been a patient in that system. And I know that in certain parts of the world people like me would end up being bankrupt. But, in Canada when you have an illness like I had, the system takes care of you."

Earlier, we reported the forests and range ministry's tenure and revenue executive director David Morel - along with former deputy transportation minister Dan Doyle had been appointed to implement the pharmaceutical task force's recommendations. Some might consider Mr. Morel's appointment to be curious, since forest and drug policies have little relation to one another. Although he has stickhandled at least one other controversial issue for the provincial government. According to a biography posted by the Coast Forest Products Association, prior to joining the British Columbia civil service as the forest service's international relations and trade manager, "he worked in the Department of Foreign Affairs and the Ontario government. This has left David with the somewhat dubious distinction of "resolving" the softwood lumber dispute for three different governments."

The provincial government is contracting out its high-profile Trees for Tomorrow initiative. The intiative - an urban reforestation program that was announced in the Campbell administration's recent throne speech - will see four million trees "planted in schoolyards, hospital grounds, parks, campuses, parking lots, paths and walkways and other public spaces in BC communities." And, today, the government quietly announced on BC Bid it's looking for a contractor to "undertake communication, educational components, as well as the coordination of administration of the application and grant process of the Trees for Tomorrow for the entire province of BC."

That request for proposal also states government will be providing "in excess of $10 million in provincial funding over five years" to Tress for Tomorrow. Although the community development ministry won't be "responsible for directly supplying trees for this intiative." Moreover, funding for Trees for Tomorrow projects will be "on at least a 1:1 basis (provincial: other)." And that means "all funds awarded through the Initiative will not exceed 50% of the total cost of a project." The following is complete copy of the relevant portion of that bid document.

***

B. Requirements and Response

1. Summary of the Requirement

The Province has committed to be carbon neutral by 2010 and to reduce provincial greenhouse gas emissions by at least 33 per cent below 2007 levels by 2020.

Trees for Tomorrow will provide opportunities for every community in BC to help sequester carbon, beautify public spaces and make their communities greener and healthier.

Over the next five years, these communities will plant four million trees in BC’s urban areas, absorbing a million tonnes of greenhouse gases, improving air quality, increasing energy efficiency and regenerating forests in urban areas affected by the Mountain Pine Beetle.

* Trees for Tomorrow is one of the Province’s key strategies for reducing greenhouse gases by 33 percent by 2020.
* Trees for Tomorrow gives BC communities, organizations and individuals a tangible way to contribute toward positive climate action while creating other social, economic and environmental benefits.
* Four million trees will be planted in schoolyards, hospital grounds, parks, campuses, parking lots, paths and walkways and other public spaces in BC communities.
* More than 120 BC communities have already signed on to the Climate Action Charter and Trees for Tomorrow will help them meet these Charter obligations.

The purpose of this RFP is to select a Proponent who, in consultation with the Ministry, will undertake communication, educational components, as well as the coordination of administration of the application and grant process of the Trees for Tomorrow for the entire province of BC. The Proponent will track and ensure that projects that have received grants are meeting the objectives of the Initiative. The Proponent will also build and nurture support for the Initiative by leveraging additional funding for projects. The Ministry retains responsibility for the Initiative and the approval of all grants.

The term of this Contract will commence approximately September 15, 2008 and continue until March 31, 2011, subject to satisfactory Contractor performance and budget availability, with the Province reserving the option to renew for up to two (2) additional one (1) year terms.

2. Additional Definitions

In addition to the Request for Proposals Definitions set out in paragraph 1 of Section A, throughout this Request for Proposals, the following definitions will apply:

a) “Afforestation” means land that has been without forest for much longer than land that would be considered reforested;
b) “BC” means the geographical region of British Columbia;
c) “Initiative” means the Trees for Tomorrow initiative; and
d) “Urban forest” means the sum of all sylvan (woody) and associated vegetation in and around dense human settlements on public lands, ranging from small communities in rural settings to metropolitan regions. Examples include street trees, remnant and emergent forest patches, tree plantations, and vegetation in parks, yards, highway verges, utility rights-of-way, and business and institutional campuses. A city’s urban forests may also be considered to extend beyond its municipal boundary to encompass forested watersheds that provide a city’s drinking water.

3. Ministry Situation/Overview

3.1 Ministry Responsibility

The Ministry envisions BC’s communities as great places in which to live. The Ministry pursues this vision by promoting liveable, sustainable communities that provide healthy and safe places for British Columbians. Additional information on the Ministry can be viewed at: http://www.gov.bc.ca/cd/.

The Ministry is responsible for the Initiative, mobilizing and engaging community groups, neighbourhoods and individuals across BC as well as leveraging private sector participation. Over the next five years, the Ministry will support local governments, school districts, stewardship groups and other community organizations to plant four million trees in urban areas to sequester carbon, enhance energy efficiency, and regenerate urban mountain pine beetle affected areas. Note that the Ministry is not responsible for directly supplying trees for this Initiative.

3.2 Background

3.2.1 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Target’s Act

The Province committed to be carbon neutral by 2010 and to reduce provincial greenhouse gas emissions by at least 33 per cent below 2007 levels by 2020 with the passing of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Target’s Act (“Act”). The Act extends to all public sector organizations, including ministries, Crown agencies, school board districts, universities and colleges, and health authorities.

BC became the first jurisdiction in North America to make a legally binding commitment to carbon neutral government operations. Additional information regarding the Province’s commitment to the environment and carbon neutrality can be viewed at:

http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/main/docs/bc_an_environmental_leader.pdf
http://www.climateactionsecretariat.gov.bc.ca.

3.2.2 The Initiative

The Initiative is a Province urban afforestation initiative designed to combat climate change, to bring local solutions to global problems, and to contribute to the goal of reducing provincial greenhouse gases (GHG) by at least 33 percent below current levels by 2020.

The February 12, 2008 Throne Speech stated: “A new Trees for Tomorrow program will launch a large, urban afforestation initiative. Millions of trees will be planted in backyards, schoolyards, hospital grounds, civic parks, campuses, parking lots and other public spaces in BC. Major investments in tree nurseries will be made to assist this initiative. These new trees will help clean our air and ‘lock away’ carbon dioxide that would otherwise contribute to global warming.”

Objectives for the Initiative are the following:

Environmental

1. to significantly increase BC’s carbon sink through urban afforestation
2. to expand urban forests so local governments can meet their Climate Action Charter obligations
3. to accelerate the forest regeneration of Mountain Pine Beetle Affected urban areas
4. to contribute to achieving zero net deforestation policy

Economic

5. to facilitate major investments in local tree nurseries through purchase of inventory
6. to contribute to energy savings in communities Social
7. to transform spaces into areas where residents can be physically and socially active
8. to promote the value of urban afforestation through education and extension
9. to optimize the strategic and continued involvement of youth and other such organizations (e.g. Youth Climate Leadership Alliance)

Two basic pillars are required to meet the objectives:

Create new or add to the existing urban forest canopies in BC with appropriate sized trees and species, which will dramatically increase survival rates in urban settings.

Reforest Mountain Pine Beetle affected urban areas with seedlings:
Seedlings will be planted in settings where traditional silvicultural methods can be used (but still within the urban forest). If necessary, a photo-degradable protective cone can be used or pioneer species can be planted to shade and fertilize the target climax community.

3.3 Project Scope/Budget

The purpose of this RFP is to select a Proponent who, in consultation with the Ministry, will undertake the communication, educational components, as well as the coordination of administration of the application and grant process of the Initiative for the entire province of BC. The Proponent will track and ensure that projects that have received grants are meeting the objectives of the Initiative. The Proponent will also build and nurture support for the Initiative by leveraging additional funding for projects. Note that funding for the Initiative is on at least a 1:1 basis (provincial: other). All funds awarded through the Initiative will not exceed 50% of the total cost of a project. The Ministry retains responsibility for the Initiative and the approval of all grants.

The preference of the Ministry is to select one Proponent to provide all services described in this RFP. Joint submissions or sub-contracting is permitted to ensure that coverage of this Initiative reaches all communities across BC. Refer to A. “Definitions and Administrative Requirements” section 17 “Sub-Contracting” for specific details regarding joint submissions or sub-contracting.

3.3.1 Location

Proponents are responsible for and will work at their own office location that is equipped with the necessary office communication to provide the services described in this RFP such as telephone, fax and e-mail. Further Proponents should possess standard office automation tools and the necessary computer hardware and software to perform the services describe in this RFP.

3.3.2 Travel

In consultation with the Ministry, travel will be required across BC to promote the Initiative, conduct workshops and build support for the Initiative.

When required or requested by the Ministry, the Proponent will meet or perform services or will attend meetings with stakeholders at the Ministry office or at other locations in Greater Victoria. Note that Proponents located outside the Greater Victoria area are responsible for all travel related expenditures to and from their location to Greater Victoria.

3.3.3 Budget

The Province is providing in excess of $10 million in provincial funding over five years for the entire the Initiative and all funding for grants.
3.3.4 Payment

Payment is subject to Ministry approval and the completion of deliverables.

Actual timing and amounts of payments will be negotiated with the successful Proponent.

3.3.5 Term

The term of this Contract will commence approximately September 15, 2008 and continue until March 31, 2011, subject to satisfactory contractor performance and budget availability, with the Province reserving the option to renew for up to two (2) additional one (1) year terms.

4. Requirements

4.1 Qualifications and Experience

4.1.1 Minimum of five (5) years of experience providing services for similar projects of scope and nature to those described in this RFP including:

* Demonstrated experience delivering province-wide programs of similar scope and nature;
* Demonstrated experience ensuring province-wide programs reached at the local level;

4.1.2 Demonstrated experience in engaging, mobilizing and working with local governments, school districts, universities, hospitals, volunteer organizations, stewardship groups, community organizations and other stakeholders;

4.1.3 Ability to link to other the Province initiatives—particularly to the Youth Climate Action Alliance;

4.1.4 Extensive experience leveraging funds from non-government sources;

4.1.5 Proven ability to develop performance measurement framework, success indicators and reporting process;

4.1.6 Understand the total environment in which the urban afforestation initiative must operate, including all the physical (including biological), institutional, social, legal, and political factors that either facilitate or inhibit management of urban forests;

4.1.7 Proven knowledge of urban forest needs, such as its health, vigour, invasive species, diversity, stocking, functionality, and aesthetics;

4.1.8 Inherent expertise in the technical aspects of urban afforestation;

4.1.9 Minimum five years of experience in urban afforestation.

4.2 Services

The Proponent, in consultation with the Ministry, will be responsible for the following:

Communication

4.2.1 Generating interest and public profile for the Initiative and create enthusiasm for the Initiative to ensure provincial-wide participation;

4.2.2 Contacting each local government and school district at least once to promote the Initiative;

4.2.3 Supporting community initiatives;

4.2.4 Building and maintaining relationships with local governments, the private sector, non profit organizations, stewardship groups, community organizations and other groups to raise financial and in-kind support and create enthusiasm;

4.2.5 Engaging and working with the Youth Climate Action Alliance;

4.2.6 Ensuring significant community project milestones are celebrated with appropriate profile for partners.

4.2.7 Notifying the Province of all community and regional events related to the Initiative. This includes milestones, as well as planting events, public consultations, and all other activities;

4.2.8 Generating interest and acceptance in the Initiative from local governments, community organizations, private sector and local stewardship groups;

4.2.9 Attracting grant applications from communities throughout BC, with varying populations and sizes;

4.2.10 Developing linkages to other Province initiatives.

Education

4.2.11 In consultation with the Ministry, implementing 25 educational workshops on urban afforestation for communities, using general topics, themes and possible content provided by the Ministry, between the commencement of the contract and March 31, 2009. Workshops wil