Liberals asked what Families First means to them

Provincial Liberal members are being asked for their thoughts on what the new Clark administration's Family First agenda should look like. But representatives from two key children's advocacy groups say they have yet to be asked for their opinions. In an email sent yesterday to fellow Liberals in her constituency, North Vancouver-Seymour MLA Jane Thornthwaite wrote she would "like to hear what 'Families First' means to you" before the cabinet committee responsible for that initiative meets. But First Call provincial coordinator Adrienne Montani said her coalition hasn't been extended a similar offer from the government. And neither has the British Columbia Association of Social Workers, according to its executive director Linda Korbin.

In a response, a Clark administration spokesperson said Ms. Thornthwaite - a member of the Families First cabinet committee - sent the email on her own initiative rather than as part of a government-led consultation effort. The spokesperson said it was likely the government would be speaking with stakeholders, as well as the public, about Families First in the future. The following is a complete copy of Ms. Thornthwaite's email.


From: North Vancouver Seymour
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 8:08 PM
Subject: A Message from MLA Jane Thornthwaite

April 2011

Dear North Van - Seymour BC Liberal,

I am excited to have been appointed by Premier Christy Clark to the Cabinet's new "Families First" Committee. The creation of this Committee is a result of our new Premier's leadership campaign commitment to ensure that the impact on BC families of every cabinet decision is given careful consideration. Before our first Committee meeting, I'd like to hear what "Families First" means to you. I request your input, so please contact me by email or phone to offer your ideas.

Premier Clark has also asked me to advise her on what can be done by the provincial government to encourage our children and young people to lead healthier lives. How can we promote more active lifestyles? How can we ensure they adopt healthier diets? These are important questions for the future of our province. I have many ideas of my own based on my work experience of 22 years as a Registered Dietitian and mother (of three). But I will value your ideas, too. Do we need to modify the school curriculum? Is it a matter of more community planning for accessible options, such as bike routes? How about tax credits to encourage fitness? What do you think?

If there are other issues you want me to bring to the attention of the new Premier and Cabinet, please let me know. Issues I have heard about from other constituents that you may wish to comment on include:

Transportation: Highway No. 1 reconfiguration at Fern Street/Exit 22. An upgraded Phibbs Exchange. Improved bus service.

Health: The proposed Mental Health & Addiction Centre at LGH. Ambulance and East of Seymour first responder issues.

Education: School closures. Selling of surplus school lands.

Over the next few months, I plan to host events with Premier Christy Clark, Finance Minister and Deputy Premier Kevin Falcon, and Education Minister George Abbott. We'll let you know the details when we have scheduled these events.

In the meantime, if you would like to get involved with these events or other activities in our riding, please give me a call. There is always a lot to do to keep our province on the right track, and you can play an important part.

Yours truly,


Jane Thornthwaite, MLA
North Vancouver-Seymour


This does sound a bit odd. First you announce a policy, then you consult on what it should mean. Sounds like Christy Clark.

I remember when Campbell pick GHG reduction targets out of thin air, then created a publicly funded body to justify his plan. Yeah, it's the party way.

"The spokesperson said it was likely the government would be speaking with stakeholders, as well as the public, about Families First in the future."

Likely? Really? I'm not even surprised that that isn't a certainty. Again, it's the party way.

And here we are ruminating over how Harper's party is contemptuous of democracy. He learned lots from watching BC for the last decade.

When the Family First "policy" was announced during the leadership race it seemed to be more of a "lens" by which the government would look at policy initiatives rather than a "policy" per se. I do not see what the problem is with the government now seeking input on what this might actually mean and some specific initiatives that might be undertaken as part of a Family First "agenda". This is the total opposite of the approach followed in the example of the GHG targets that was cited. So, notwithstanding concerns over who they may consult with, the fact that they are consulting prior to announcing anything specific is a good thing, isn't it?

Are the BC Liberals under Christy Clark any more likely to consult with stakeholders than under Gordon Campbell? I predict that the outcome will be just be the same old cereal in a different box, with artificial sweetener added. We must remember that she still has the usual Gordon Campbell sycophants in her Cabinet.

Leave a comment

Copyright © 2004 - Public Eye Mediaworks. Reproductions of any portion of this Website are permitted only with the expressed permission of Public Eye Mediaworks.
Canadian Web Hosting graciously provided by dotcanuck Web Services. Layout and graphics courtesy of Art Department Design.