Du Toit honoured prior to being replaced

The Times Colonist's editorial page described it as a "long overdue management overhaul." But not everyone is pleased to see the back of Lesley du Toit, whose controversial five-year reign as the bureaucratic head of the ministry of children and family development came to an abrupt end earlier this month. On March 4 - just ten days before it was revealed Ms. du Toit had been replaced by the new Clark administration - the British Columbia Association of Aboriginal Friendship Centres feted her during an event at a traditional aboriginal big house near the Royal British Columbia Museum.

In an interview with Public Eye, the association's executive director Paul Lacerte explained the intent of the honouring feast was to "stand up for individuals in the ministry of children and families that we have felt have done a lot to advance the aboriginal agenda" - adding that three other bureaucrats were also invited to the ceremony.

"We observed some protocols in there and had a big feast and then blanketed them with traditional Cowichan woven blankets and gifted those blankets to them," he explained.

Mr. Lacerte said it wasn't "clear" at the time the ceremony took place that Ms. du Toit was on her way out. Although members of the children and family services community had speculated about her departure - in part, because of the deputy's troubled relationship with the province's independent child protection watchdog Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond.

Mr. Lacerte acknowledged, "I don't think that dynamic helped any of us. But notwithstanding that there was a clash of two matriarchs, we'll certainly miss Lesley." The reason: "it's been rare that we've had such a strong advocate for aboriginal issues at the deputy minister level."

Mr. Lacerte said aboriginal friendship centres across the province have held similar events to "try to create a different tone" between the ministry of children and family and indigenous peoples, recognizing bureaucrats who have "showed a willingness to think and act differently as it relates to our people."


We need a deputy who is there for ALL kids.

Du Toit wasn't fired because of her "troubled relationship" with Turpel-Lafond, she was fired because of her inability to be accountable for failing to carry out her job in the most basic ways. Many, many of Hughes recommendations have not been implemented, while Du Toit ignored them and set out on her own half-baked and confusing schemes of "re-organization."

How exactly are things better for Aboriginal children and families in BC as a result of Du Toit's "advocacy"? Did Friendship centres around BC receive increases in their budgets? That defies logic when this Deputy Minister took $2000 per month for a "living allowance" (on top of salary and bonuses) from 2006 to the day she was fired, in 2011. Children and families living in poverty were much more deserving of those taxpayer funds.

Well, I guess Mr. Lacerte and his organization will be amongst the only ones who will "miss Lesley" because if you polled other "members of the children and family services community" you'd find most are happy she's and Mary Polak are gone.

I do not agree BC Liberals Suck, I also find this the wrong place for BCLS' lamblasting. But I have to tell you I smile.

Kinda becuz my hero didn't get to keep her dream job because of this twittwat. Kinda because taxpayer money was wasted while BC Liberals Rock to save the world... supposedly.

I agree w/ Eric as well. Off hot.

Perhaps Lesley, they were not yet ready for your new-world thinking.

To "BC Liberals Suck" - Is money the only answer to better conditions?

Leave a comment

Copyright © 2004 - Public Eye Mediaworks. Reproductions of any portion of this Website are permitted only with the expressed permission of Public Eye Mediaworks.
Canadian Web Hosting graciously provided by dotcanuck Web Services. Layout and graphics courtesy of Art Department Design.