Advertisers


August 18, 2008
A seed in the bucket

Last week, the Campbell administration revealed would be planting four million trees in urban areas as part of a $10 million initiative to "provide opportunities for every community in BC to help sequester carbon." But the planting of those trees might not have as much impact on the province's greenhouse gas emissions as you would think. According to the government's own climate action plan, "a single large, mature tree can absorb more than 20 kilograms of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere every year." That means, by the time the government's Trees for Tomorrow seeds growup, they'll be absorbing 80,000 tonnes of carbon annually. By comparison, according to Environment Canada, Duke Energy Corp.'s Fort Nelson Gas Plant emmitted 1,895,602 tonnes of that greenhouse gas in 2004.

Posted by Sean Holman at 01:04 PM
Permanent link

If King Gordo tells us all those trees will help the environment, well he in his own mind is always right. But trees are beinng clear cut right now. How many tons of carbon dioxide will be around as those trees head across the border. How much carbon dioxide was produced by the private jet that took him to China? Big business need not worry as Gordo is on side with the big polutters.

Posted by Avoter on August 18, 2008 07:40 PM

"A single mature tree can absorb carbon dioxide at a rate of 48 lbs./year and release enough oxygen back into the atmosphere to support 2 human beings...." -http://www.coloradotrees.org/benefits.htm
*******************************************
http://www.ubcbotanicalgarden.org/forums/showthread.php?t=27792

"Re: What plant consumes the most CO2

I would think that the amount of Biomass produced per acre would be a good measure for Carbon Dioxide consumption per acre. It seems that I recall that algae were also good consumers of Carbon Dioxide.

I am also interested in this topic after seeing a PBS program on Global Dimming. I am sure that climate, soil type, and other factors impact the amount of biomass produced and consequently the amount of CO2 consumed. I would think that to be of any benefit to environmental change, the CO2 would have to be tied up in the biomass in large quantities for long periods of time as the decay of biomass yields CO2. So, trees, while typically slower growing, would provide a longer term CO2 sink.

Thoughts?

***********************************

montyb
View Public Profile
Find all posts by montyb

#6 September 10th, 2007
Michael F
Plant Enthusiast
Location: Britain zone 8/9

Re: What plant consumes the most CO2

------------------------------

The duckweed Lemna seems to be one of the most productive, with a theoretical productivity (in optimised conditions) of 183 tonnes of dry matter per hectare per year. In practice, yields are more usually 10-20 tonnes per hectare per year, though one study yielded 51 tonnes per hectare per year (see table 1):
http://www.fao.org/ag/AGA/AGAP/FRG/lrrd/lrrd7/1/3.htm

Not very good in terms of a long-term sink though. For that, trees are better, as wood is easier to store than dried duckweed. One Abies grandis plantation in Britain has been growing at 34 cubic meters per hectare per year, and some tropical Eucalyptus etc can grow even faster.

*********************************

Although carbon dioxide is one of three main components which combine to produce the products necessary for plant growth, the amount of carbon dioxide in the air is only 0.03% (250 to 330 parts per million). This compares to 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen and 0.97% trace gases in normal air.
- http://homeharvest.com/carbondioxideenrichment.htm


Posted by Dave on August 19, 2008 07:21 AM

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


wanted: hearsay & innuendo Site Search

category archives

Allan Warnke
At the Rockpile
Bob Russell
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio

monthly archives

August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004

syndication

RSS 2.0
Atom Feed