
The provincial New Democrats continue to have bad polling results in British Columbia. They have been as much as 18 percentage points behind the Liberals in some surveys. That's hardly a place any opposition would want to be. And it certainly wasn't where the New Democrats were during the seventies and eighties. Looking at the numbers, the Liberals have between 46 to 48 percent of the vote, with the New Democrats at 32 to 36 percent and the Greens at 14 to 17 percent. Therefore, for the purposes of this analysis, I have assumed a reasonable representation of the body politic would put the Liberals at 47 percent, the New Democrats at 34 percent and the Greens at 15.5 percent. Based on these numbers - and the new 85 seat legislature - if an election were held today the result would likely be 63 to 69 seats for the Liberals, 16 to 22 seats for the New Democrats and a possible Green legislator.
In 2005, the New Democrats won more close races than they lost. Of the 13 closest, they won seven. That means the New Democrats have more marginal seats to defend than the Liberals. So even if support for the opposition was rising, those seats would still make it more difficult for the party to win government. But it's not rising. It's falling.
If the opposition loses seven more percentage points of support, the New Democrats will be reduced to less than ten safe seats. And many traditional left-leaning areas will be put into play for the Liberals. That will force Carole James to campaign in party strongholds such as Nanaimo, New Westminster and Revelstoke.
To make matters worse, the Liberals are once again doing a much better job than the New Democrats of finding strong candidates. For example, former Vancouver Grizzlies and Canucks owner Arthur Griffiths may run for the Liberals. But the New Democrat’s biggest get so far seems to be Burnaby mayor Derek Corrigan's wife.
Leaving those concerns aside, though, the latest polling numbers suggest the New Democrat will get about 645,000 out of 1.9 million probable votes in 2009. That's 87,000 less votes than they got in 2005 or a decrease of just over 1,000 votes per riding. Meanwhile, the Liberals will get about 895,000 votes. That's 87,000 more than they got in 2005 or an increase of 1,000 votes per riding. And the Greens will get about 295,000 votes - an increase of 133,000 votes or about 1,500 per riding.
And that could mean a victory for the Greens in the proposed riding of Esquimalt-Royal Roads (formerly Esquimalt-Metchosin). In the last election, the New Democrats won the riding by a reasonable margin. This, despite the fact the Liberal candidate was Tom Woods, the founder of Rock Solid. Boundary adjustments will mean the riding gains Vic West and loses Metchosin - changes that should favour the New Democrats over the Liberals.
But, in my opinion, incumbent legislator Maurine Karagianis has been one of the weaker members of the opposition. And she doesn't appear to have a strong base of local support - dampening an already soggy provincial New Democrat vote. And without Mr. Woods, the Liberal vote will also be dampened - creating a competitive environment for Green candidate and leader Jane Sterk.
Admittedly, Esquimalt isn’t Lasqueti Island - the first place the Greens won a Canadian election poll. But Ms. Sterk is being taken seriously by the provincial media. A strong local politician, she topped the township's polls in 2004. Her post as party leader should increase her provincial vote. And that vote will be aided by the influx young professionals into the riding from Vic West - who are more likely to vote for the Greens than the New Democrats. Although her chances could be thwarted if the Liberals run a strong candidate and Esquimalt-Royal Roads becomes a three-way race.
The Greens are unlikely to be serious competitors in any other ridings - notwithstanding the possibility of the party running a high-profile candidate such as former broadcaster and Socred cabinet minister Rafe Mair in a riding like West Vancouver-Sea to Sky. And that means 2009 will mark a continuation of two-party politics in British Columbia, with the Liberals once again forming government.
Bernard Schulmann, a policy and land use consultant, was recently the provincial campaign coordinator for Yes for BC-STV. In 1999, he predicted “the New Democratic Party is looking at four safe seats” in the 2001 election. “A complete shutout is not an impossibility.” Mr. Schulmann is presently a member of the provincial Liberals and federal Conservatives.
Very interesting Bernard but I would disagree with some of your assumptions, understanding that you are working with current polling not necessarily what will happen in May 2009.
First, I find it hard to see a single riding the Green Party can win, including Esquimalt-Royal Roads. The Greens only had 1 second-place finish in 2005 - West Vancouver-Garibaldi, while then-leader Adriane Carr came in third place in her home riding.
The Greens have simply not posted anywhere close to 15.5% in a provincial election and with a mostly unknown leader and little signs of a campaign or presence, Jane Sterk will have a hard time matching 2005's 9% in my view.
For example, since February the Greens have issued just 3 news releases, none earthshattering.
I agree that the NDP have to be very concerned about their current numbers and what an election would look like without improvements but the second factor is that with two parties running multi-million dollar campaigns with television, print and radio advertising, voter contact and province-wide tours, while the Greens struggle to reach $250,000, the numbers will change.
None of which is to say that your analysis doesn't give the NDP cause for concern, just that the numbers are highly likely to change prior to the election.
The one year period leading up to the May, 2005 election had much different dynamics than the current electoral landscape. Mustel had the Greens pegged between 8% and 12% during that time frame and the Liberals were also trailing for a good period of time. I wouldn't describe Adrianne Carr as very inspiring either and the Greens received 9.5%.
Currently the Greens are between 16% - 17% and Jane Sterk, is hardly a household name.
Bill might have one thing wrong though. Television, print, and radio advertising by the parties might not be as effective as he thinks. It's the "media coverage" of the parties that counts during the election period and I have an inkling that Sterk will receive her fair coverage during the campaign. Perhaps also likely a seat at the leader's debate.
Frankly, from what I have seen of Sterk, she comes across much better than either Campbell or James.
Remember, Gordon Wilson brought the Liberals from almost nowhere in 1991 to 33% of the vote. And that was not due to a Liberal multi-million dollar political advertising campaign (there was none) but rather "media coverage".
While the Greens may not win a seat in 2009, I have an inkling that they will break the 15% barrier this time around at the expense of both the NDP and the Liberals. The recent Green results in Vancouver Quadra as well as the Toronto federal ridings (Bob Rae's comes to mind) seems to echo signs of things to come.
Hi there Bill
Think of this as a wake up call for the NDP - I tried that in 1999 and had certain friends in the party that hated me for it. I remember at the time no one was willing to admit that the party was headed to a wipe out, every one said the election would turn it around.
Then there was the 2001 election with a stronger leader than the party has now and the party went into the tank much futher it should have.
I may not like the NDP, but I like a lot of New Democrats I just disagree with almost all their views on economics. I believe it is importnat to have a strong opposition to the government because it gives us better governance. This NDP caucus reminds me of the Wilson Liberal caucus - weak and not able to hold government to task let alone be a government in waiting. A stronger NDP will make Gordon Campbell an even better premier and I would be very happy with that.
As to Jane Sterk and her possible win, when I was going through all the ridings in the province, I was looking for the most potentially interesting one. A Green have a chance to win is interesting to me. I do believe the circumstances in Esquimalt Royal Roads make a Green win possible. The south island has a lot of serious people seeing the local Greens as a legtimate force in politics.
If John Horgan was the sitting MLA, I would not give Jane Sterk any real chance of winning. If the riding were one the Liberals honestly thought they could win (say Saanich South) I would not give Jane much chance, but Esquimalt Royal Roads has an interesting set of circumstances.
Do not discount the fact that Jane Sterk topped the polls as a Green in Esquimalt. I would never had predicted her being able to do that. Since then she has built a following of local people that are not Greens but will support her.
I also gave Jane Sterk low odds in being able to win the leadership of the Greens versus Ben West and Damian Kettlewell. Ben West works as an organizer and Damian Kettlewell is a very presentable (and seemingly well off) business Green. Jane surprised me at how well she understood what matters in campaigning and how she pulled off winning the Green leadership.
If the NDP were smart, they would have a strong star candidate run in Esquimalt Royal Roads and pension off Maurine Karagianis. But that would only make one more riding safer.
As someone outside of the NDP, I do have to wonder if anyone inside the party is raising hell and trying to get the party to apsire to something more than what it is now. I expect Corky Evans is doing this, but the party was not smart enough to draft him as leader in the run up to 2005.
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
Allan Warnke
At the Rockpile
Bob Russell
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
Copyright © 2004-2006 Public Eye Mediaworks. Reproductions of any portion of this Website are permitted only with the expressed permission of Public Eye Mediaworks. Public Eye is graciously hosted by TransitionalMedia. Content management services courtesy of Ian King. Layout and graphics courtesy of Art Department Design, Victoria, BC.
This site is powered by Movable Type.