Advertisers


October 28, 2007
See Jane run

This morning, on Public Eye Radio, North Vancouver-Seymour provincial Liberal legislator Dan Jarvis joins us to discuss why he voted against the Tsawwassen Final Agreement. Green leader Jane Sterk talks about her future vision for the party. And Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows MLA Michael Sather shares his thoughts on the present legislative session. Also on the show: our rabble-rousing panel - Don Anderson, Alex Tsakumis, Bob Russell and Allan Warnke - debate the week that was in provincial and federal politics. You can listen to Public Eye Radio outside of Victoria by logging into CFAX 1070 between 8:30 and 10:00. If you have a question for one of our guests, you can email us, leave a comment below or phone (250) 386-1161 during the show.

Posted by Sean Holman at 07:56 AM
Permanent link

Bring on the politicians! nice to see many of them in the Green ranks coming out to support STV for purely partisan reasons, after all it was pounded into 160 self /randomly selected citizens that politicians "hate it" right?

Posted by Rick Dignard on October 28, 2007 05:14 PM

I like how Tsakumis tied together the treaty process, the sinking of the queen of the north and the convention center.

Tsakumis is right. Gordon Campbell has become arrogant to think that we will fall for it.It's his mess so his ministers should not have to clean up for him.

Posted by Jane seas on October 28, 2007 06:55 PM

Rick, as seen in PEI and Ontario, your precious MMP is unwanted by voters.

There was a reason why your colleagues in BC made the right decision which deliver us 57% of the votes as opposed to the 36% for MMP.

http://www.citizensassembly.gov.on.ca/en-CA/Get-Involved/View-And-Search-Submissions/Detailed-View.aspx?ID=1110

Posted by Dan on October 29, 2007 12:34 AM

Actually, a very large percentage of people interested in Electoral reform are very interested in the MMP system,REFORM OF ANY KIND is unwanted by those voters, if you think those two provinces would have jumped at the chance to implement an STV system instead, well you fill your boots,while your gloating over recent events, make sure you put them into context, it's a shame the premier refused to do this right and let we the voters decide on which system is best for B.C., I'm curious, do you really believe an STV proposal would have garnered 60% in Ontario?

Posted by Rick Dignard on October 29, 2007 09:06 PM

It will, once BC passes it.

While many of us support STV, we did our best to help our colleagues out in Ontario because we think any change big or small is better than the status quo.

Had MMP been proposed in BC, I have my serious doubts as to whether it would have been able to achieve 50%, but the STV hardcore would have likely held our nose and supported it.

The best the "no" side could do in BC was try and confuse voters, and the arguments are still out there. The only people with a legitimate ground to dislike STV are people who believe that a government should have an absolute mandate under a majority.

Unlike MMP (especially with closed lists), there are very credible arguments against STV that have any traction. However, MMP is a pro-rep bandage, which keeps all of the problems with the current system and hands out a few consolation seats to parties that can't win a local election. The only systems I have seen with MMP that seem to work are so modified (broken into regions, open lists, etc.) that it is practically STV.


Posted by Daniel Grice on October 30, 2007 10:43 PM

Notwithstanding Daniel Grice's dishonesty in painting with such a broad brush with repsect to those of us astute enough to oppose the insanity of STV, no majority government has ever had absolute power.

Lest Mr. Grice and his greasy thinkers forget, those who govern with any semblance of absoluteness, are relegated to the trash heap in the very next polls usually.

That's democracy Danny. You'd better get used to it since your now a bigshot, successful poltician.

Lord give us hope that the Green Party will appropriately become the birdcage liner of the next election. With Elizabeth Mayday, it's certainly likely.

Posted by A. G. Tsakumis on October 31, 2007 11:39 AM

I'm glad Mr. Tsakumis is so fond of pointing out the insanity of having a representative legislature and using a preferential ballot.

While Alex and the astute old boys' may like the lump and dump politics that exist in BC, some of us greasy thinkers are yearning for the day when the electorate are given a little bit of respect and we see a government that reflects the real intentions of the voters.

Posted by Daniel Grice on November 3, 2007 02:39 AM




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

wanted: hearsay & innuendo Site Search

category archives

Allan Warnke
At the Rockpile
Bob Russell
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio

monthly archives

November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004

syndication

RSS 2.0
Atom Feed