Advertisers


September 03, 2007
A clean slate?

Back in July, 24 hours' Alex Tsakumis reported Mayor Sam Sullivan's "henchmen have hatched a plot, at his 'quiet' behest to protect him from an NPA mayoral nomination meeting in 2008." But it seems the association's park board members aren't as enthusiastic about that proposal - which would ensure incumbent candidates won't have to compete for a spot on the civic party's slate. In an email sent to association president Matthew Taylor, Heather Holden, Korina Houghton, Ian Robertson and Marty Zlotnik write, "we the elected NPA Park Board caucus strongly oppose any type of incumbency protection. It is our view that the strength of the NPA has been and will continue to be its ability to attract the very best and brightest candidates that Vancouver has to offer. This cannot be accomplished with incumbency protection."

Asked for comment on the letter, Mr. Taylor said, "as the board prepares its nomination rules for the upcoming election year. We have made a special effort to consult with members of caucus. And we appreciate and listen very carefully to the views of caucus as expressed. There was nothing inappropriate about this (letter). To the contrary, this is exactly what we asked for." Taylor also said association board discussions about incumbency protection haven’t been driven by the mayor's supporters. The following is a complete copy of that email.

***

August 29, 2007
Matthew Taylor
President
Non-Partisan Association

Via E-Mail

Dear Matthew,

Further to your request for input from the NPA caucus regarding incumbency protection, we the elected NPA Park Board caucus strongly oppose any type of incumbency protection. It is our view that the strength of the NPA has been and will continue to be its ability to attract the very best and brightest candidates that Vancouver has to offer. This cannot be accomplished with incumbency protection.

Thank you for the opportunity to express our opinion.

Sincerely

Heather Holden

Korina Houghton

Ian Robertson

Marty Zlotnik

Posted by Sean Holman at 04:07 PM
Permanent link

It'll be interesting to see what the npa council caucus opinion is on incumbency protection...

Posted by Vancouver Kid on September 3, 2007 05:04 PM

VancouverKid

As it will be with Vision Vancouver. Since you have worked on their VV communications, what is your opinion?

Posted by jamielee on September 3, 2007 07:05 PM

Probably the only time myself and the npa parks board will agree: no incumbency protection.

Posted by Vancouver Kid on September 4, 2007 09:32 AM

it should also be noted that as for Vision's official decision on incumbency, it'll be voted on at an agm by members, not decided by the exec (a la npa)

Posted by Vancouver Kid on September 4, 2007 10:00 PM




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

wanted: hearsay & innuendo Site Search

category archives

Allan Warnke
At the Rockpile
Bob Russell
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio

monthly archives

September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004

syndication

RSS 2.0
Atom Feed