
The Campbell administration's conversation on health was meant to give ordinary British Columbians a say in the future of the province's healthcare system. But unions representing workers in that system aren't the only special interest groups encouraging conversation participation. Earlier this year, pharamceutical company Merck Frosst Canada Ltd. setup a Website to do just that. Not surprisingly, the testimonials featured on that Website focus on those who have benefited from or are advocating for expanded Pharmacare coverage. For example, Lawrie's Story
tells the tale of a 68-year old Chilliwack resident who has been "trying to find out why BC doesn't cover the cost" of the medication he takes to "keep his blood pressure in check and lower his cholesterol."
In an interview with Public Eye, Merck Frosst public affairs manager Vincent Lamoreux explained the Website was simply a "way of encouraging as many citizens as possible to take part in the conversation on health. Of course, Merck Frosst, as a company, commended Premier Campbell's effort and his government when it introduced the conversation on health because it's a mechanism to engage all British Columbians in an effort to find ways to improve healthcare."
Continued Mr. Lamoreux, "Merck Frosst - as you very well know - is a pharmaceutical company and a partner in healthcare in Canada and in British Columbia. So we welcome the opportunity to be able to contribute to the conversation on health. And, of course, we have things to say - input and suggestions on how pharmaceutical management is part of the healthcare equation in Canada. So the interests of patients are certainly shared with the interests of our company. We have common goals."
Indeed, according to the spokesman, "It's clear that anything that's good for patients will be good for our company. Because everything that we do - as to research for new innovative drugs - will help patients lead better lives. So, of course, we're interested in making sure patients have access to our products. It's good for the patient and it's good for our company."
"It's clear that anything that's good for the patient will be good for our company," offers a Merck-Frosst spokesthingy.
Well, how about the right for patients to access generic drugs that are usually far cheaper and at least as safe as the Merck-Frosst
products?
"Merck Frosst - as you very well know - is a pharmaceutical company and a partner in healthcare in Canada and in British Columbia."
Since when? I would sincerely hope that the various health authorities in Canada are MONITORING pharms co's and not partnering with them.
Such sneaky and weasely language. I am so sick of hearing about 'partners'. What's next, a P3 deal with big pharma companies?
That paragraph disgusts me.
Allan Warnke
At the Rockpile
Bob Russell
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
Copyright © 2004-2006 Public Eye Mediaworks. Reproductions of any portion of this Website are permitted only with the expressed permission of Public Eye Mediaworks. Public Eye is graciously hosted by TransitionalMedia. Content management services courtesy of Ian King. Layout and graphics courtesy of Art Department Design, Victoria, BC.
This site is powered by Movable Type.