Advertisers


April 05, 2007
Kinder surprise?

A provincial government report prepared by the ministry of energy, mines and petroleum resources states Terasen Inc. owner Kinder Morgan Inc. wants to "discourage electricity" use in British Columbia and "replace (it) with natural gas." But a spokesperson for Terasen says "that would be an inaccuracy" - rejecting suggestions Kinder Morgan wants the government to introduce a pricing system that could see some British Columbians who use electricity to heat their homes pay a higher Hydro rate than those who use other sources, such as natural gas.

The report, which was obtained via a freedom of information request, summarizes a January 31 meeting between Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Minister Neufeld and Kinder Morgan chairman and chief executive officer Rich Kinder - as well as president Park Shaper and chief operating officer Steven Kean. The meeting occured while Minister Neufeld was attending a convention in Houston, Texas. According to the report, after the executives expressed a desire to replace electricity use with natural gas, "BC noted that electricity is cheap and competes with gas."

Kinder Morgan then suggested introducing "incremental prices" for residential electricity consumers. Under such a system - which has been in place for BC Hydro's industrial customers since 2005 - the more power you use, the higher your kilowatt hour rate will be.

That encourages energy conservation. And, in an interview with Public Eye, Terasen corporate communications manager Joyce Wagenaar said her company is just working to make sure British Columbians "use the right fuel, at the right place, at the right time" - work that's taking place in cooperation with BC Hydro.

But incremental pricing also means those who don't heat their homes with electricity could receive a lower kilowatt hour rate than those who do, depending on how much power they use. Kinder Morgan is set to transfer ownership of Terasen to Canadian utility company Fortis Inc. sometime this year - having announced those plans on February 26. The ministry of energy, mines and petroleum resources declined to comment on Minister Neufeld's meeting with Kinder Morgan executives. The following is the relevant section of the aforementioned report.

***

Kinder Morgan: Attended by Rich Kinder (CEO), Steven Kean, Park Shaper

Summary of Discussion:
* KM provided an update on their projects. The Transmountain Pipeline (TMX) was continuing, seeing need for more transport to Vancouver and Seattle. Marketers demand is increasing from the South and Asia. TMX capacity is 225k bod (barrels of oil per day)
* In total $4b of projects upcoming mostly in BC.
* Park boundaries to be addressed.
* MEMPR has a Major Oil and Gas Projects Team in place.. Park boundaries are set by legislature, when it is a park created by legislation (vs. OIC).

(s. 13, 16)

Vancouver Terminals:

(s. 21)

Pipeline Construction:
Steve Kean noted that all is on time for BC Hydro to connect pump stations. MEMPR available to assist in resolving any issues that might arise.

Energy Plan:
* Energy Plan will be released in the 1st quarter of 2007

Energy Policies/BC Hydro:
* Rich Kinder inquired about electrical use and projects.
* BC Hydro will have a call for 55 giagwatts to be provided by IPPs. Last call for 2500 netted 7000 gwh - challenge is in firm rather than intermittent power.
* KM would like to see natural gas be part of the demand side management - discourage electricity and replace with natural gas. BC noted that electricity is cheap and competes with gas. In the last open call there were no bidders for natural gas facilities. KM discussed the economics of energy pricing and suggested incremental prices for residents (as it is currently for industry).

Posted by Sean Holman at 07:12 AM
Permanent link

* Park boundaries to be addressed.
* MEMPR has a Major Oil and Gas Projects Team in place.. Park boundaries are set by legislature, when it is a park created by legislation (vs. OIC).

Good work digging out this Email/memo, Sean. Even more than the pricing suggestions, I think the two park boundary bullets could be the beginning of serious controversy.

Posted by Budd Campbell on April 5, 2007 07:46 AM

there's a host of good policy reasons why the per-unit charge on everybody's hydro bill should go up after a certain monthly consumption threshold (determined on whether you, i.e. heat your home with electricity and how cold a part of the province you live in)

given mr. kinder's concern for demand management, and the fact that gas is supplied by a private not public company, he probably wouldn't have objected to the province levying a small excess consumption tax on every unit after an appropriate threshold, so we can encourage conservation and fund R&D on energy sources we'll need post his transtional fuel ...

Posted by Heaney on April 5, 2007 07:55 AM

So nice to know that BC Ministers are continuing the honoured tradition of meeting with corporate officials from big American companies interested in BC Assets other than BC Rail.

Well done Sean.

Posted by G West on April 5, 2007 11:01 AM




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

wanted: hearsay & innuendo Site Search

category archives

Allan Warnke
At the Rockpile
Bob Russell
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio

monthly archives

April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004

syndication

RSS 2.0
Atom Feed