Advertisers


February 01, 2007
A conspiracy of silence?

It took BC Hydro Corp. just over seven months to award power contracts to two controversial coal-fired power plants - which some environmentalists estimate could push British Columbia's greenhouse gas emissions up by roughly 2.5 percent. But the Sierra Legal Defense Fund has waited more than five months for the government to respond to a request for any records it has about that announcement (such as the environmental and public health impacts those plants will have on the province). And, guess what? The defense fund is still waiting - with the documents expected to arrive sometime in early February. This, despite the fact, British Columbia's freedom of information legislation gives the ministry of environment 30 working days to respond to such a request - plus a few extensions.

Of course, such delays won't come as a surprise to the staff lawyer who filed that request. In 2005, Sean Nixon signed his name to a University of Victoria environmental law centre letter asking information and privacy commissioner David Loukidelis to investigate "an apparent system-wide pattern" whereby government has made it "more and more difficult" for organizations like the fund to obtain public records. The request hasn't yet been acted on. But Mr. Nixon says this most recent delay, "is further evidence suggesting that there's a systemic problem in government with their approach to access information. It suggests they are intentionally frustrating environmental groups efforts to get information that might leave egg on the government's face."

Posted by Sean Holman at 08:31 AM
Permanent link

Once again this government is hiding the facts about a serious issue.

Could it be that the coal barons fear having a little light shone on the bullshit science being used to flog the dirtiest fuel there is?

Sounds like another farmed fish fiasco if you ask me.

Posted by bleedingheart on February 1, 2007 09:08 AM

Don't think conspiracy think a more darker thought - incompetence.

Posted by "Me thinks you think too much!" on February 1, 2007 10:39 AM

No, it's pretty clearly a conspiracy, albiet a small and transparent one. The decision is "controversial" only at the insistence of the corporations that will benefit from the plants -- there is no controversy for anyone else, because we can see that two coal-fired plants are a giant step backwards. Surely reason and policy both demand that a less 19th century solution is needed.

Posted by T. Bailey on February 1, 2007 09:47 PM

Gordo and Co. want to dig and sell coal so that's what will happen unless the voters catch on and boot the bums out. FOI stuff can be held up basically when the government wants it that wau. Even if it shows up expcer more blacked out areas that the stuff that can be read,

Posted by DL on February 2, 2007 12:54 PM

I have found that 6 months to a year is pretty much standard now for FOI act requests. If the SLDF can get a response in 5 months then they are ahead of the game and I am jealous!

Posted by Innocent Bystander on February 2, 2007 05:32 PM

Hopefully these FOI’s will tell us who was the idiot at BC Hydro that approved these projects in the first place. Whoever it was, should be fired.

Posted by Kevin Larsen on February 2, 2007 07:43 PM

I hadn't noticed this till now. History was made here on February 2nd when Kevin Larsen implicitly criticized an economic policy decision of the BC Liberal Govt.

A public forum on the subject of IPPs was held last week in Maple Ridge sponsored by BC Citizens for Public Power. Present were MLAs Randy Hawes, BC Liberal from Maple Ridge-Mission and Mike Sather, NDP from Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows, as well as John Calvert an SFU instructor with Citizens for Public Power and Steve David with the IPP Assn.

Calvert presented figures showing that the cost of producing electricity in the exisiting hydo dams, which provide 78% of BC's electricity, is $5.81 per megawatt. Contrast this to the price of $66.00 per megawatt that will be paid to the IPPs. NDP MLA Mike Sather interpreted this to mean that the prices "negotiated" are simply designed to make private power more competitive against the exiting system. Hawes' interpretation was more ideological, saying "We don't think profit's a bad word."

Posted by Budd Campbell on February 4, 2007 11:09 AM




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

wanted: hearsay & innuendo Site Search

category archives

Allan Warnke
At the Rockpile
Bob Russell
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio

monthly archives

February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004

syndication

RSS 2.0
Atom Feed