Advertisers


January 22, 2007
Russell: "...many Canadians don't like to be called ordinary."

Since Liberal MP Wajid Khan's formal defection to the Conservative frontbenches, there's been much buzz about how the New Democrats now hold the balance of power. But that's only if you can conjure up a scenario where both the Liberals and the Bloc Quebecois together want to bring the government down - with Jack Layton and his caucus the only parliamentarians standing in their way. And since that scenario seems increasingly unlikely, the only winner here is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. The reason: because he now only needs one party, any party in the house, to support his government in order for it to survive. In other words, the Conservatives now have considerable more wriggle room to keep governing on an issue by issue basis.

Still, New Democrat leader Jack Layton is "hell-bent” on using his party's new strategic value to the Conservatives to take the government to task on the environment. But any belief that the NDP will be rewarded by drawing support away from the Greens will likely meet with disappointment. After all, the Green's popularity is drawn from across the political spectrum - not just the left. And it's the government, not the NDP, who will be judged on the environment file. Moreover, historically, when using the balance of power in minority Parliaments to effect change the NDP usually loses seats in the next election.

True, in the election following the last minority government the NDP was able to make gains because of a combination of a deep seeded contempt for the Liberals and a mistrust of the Conservatives. Since then, however, the Conservatives have made some progress toward appearing if not moderate, at least less scary. And every day the Liberals distance themselves a little further from their previous selves. So come the next election, Mr. Layton is less likely to have success positioning his party as a safe bet for those who have reservations about the alternatives.

In addition, since the prime minister can pick and choose among three parties to keep his government alive, the NDP will not have the power and profile it has commanded in previous minorities. So it will have even more trouble reaping any consequent electoral benefit.

As a result, once Mr. Layton has written the government's new environmental policy - one he will later claim "does not go far enough” - watch for him to do everything he can to stave off an election, claiming that he wants to make the minority Parliament work for "ordinary” Canadians. To do otherwise would bring on an election where the NDP will likely lose seats.

Of course, it's true that, between now and then, Canadians may be able to come up with reasons to vote "for” the NDP as opposed to voting against the alternatives. But that would require the NDP to understand, among other things, that their desire to redistribute wealth might be helped if it were prefaced by a credible plan to create or at least sustain it...and many Canadians don't like to be called ordinary.

Bob Russell, a businessman and former civil servant, was chief of staff for the provincial Liberals in Alberta from 1986 to 1989. In 2004, he ran for the federal Liberal nomination in Saanich-Gulf Islands.

Posted by Sean Holman at 08:33 AM
Permanent link

I like the way this Russel guys thinks. He has a far better handle on the working of politics at a practical level than most people we read in the media.

Posted by Patrick Hrushowy on January 22, 2007 09:47 AM

Actually, I think Bob Russell is acting pretty much like an "ordinary" right-wing Canadian commentator, slinging some pretty "ordinary" (as in not very deep), bile here.

But his cheap shot at NDP fiscal efforts proves beyond a doubt just how "ordinary" Russell's views are for a right-wing hack.

Perhaps next effort he'll add a bit of Alberta beef or something of substance to his arguments.

Posted by bleedingheart on January 22, 2007 10:21 AM

Being an ordinary Canadian I probably don't have anything of much importance to offer in response to Russell's column.

However, I think his statement that the NDP tends to loose votes and seats at the end of minority parliaments where it has negotiated changes in public policy is based on really just one case, the 1972 to 1974 minority parliament. In the 1974 election the NDP did indeed loose seats. But generalizing from that one Liberal success story in adopting NDP policies, then picking up the party's votes, to a general tendency for this to happen is a case of the writer's craft exceeding his factual base.

Posted by Budd Campbell on January 22, 2007 10:36 AM

Budd
I know it's not parliament, but i think Rae and the NDP also went down in seats in the election following their participation in David Peterson's minority.

Posted by Heaney on January 22, 2007 11:16 AM

Thank you for your comment Budd and you are right, sometimes a little creative licence is used to make a point and I will confess to being as guilty of that as anyone. But I might point out that in this instance if you look at election results following a minority Parliament starting with Diefenbaker's 1957 minority, the NDP show a net loss of 13 seats.

Posted by Bob Russell on January 22, 2007 11:22 AM

Bob Russell is right that the CCF dropped a large number of seats in the Diefenbaker sweep of 1958. But that still makes it only two cases.

And the Diefenbaker example doesn't really involve the CCF/NDP having spent time during that minority parliament negotiating changes to government policy with the Conservative minority government. Heaney's Ontario provincial example is probably more applicable.

Posted by Budd Campbell on January 22, 2007 03:46 PM




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

wanted: hearsay & innuendo Site Search

category archives

Allan Warnke
At the Rockpile
Bob Russell
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio

monthly archives

January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004

syndication

RSS 2.0
Atom Feed