Advertisers


January 05, 2007
Meanwhile, on the Road to Damascus

"Can this man save the environment?" That was the headline The Gazette ran above a profile of Canada's new environment minister John Baird. But perhaps a better question is "does he even want to save the environment?" After all, back when he was Ontario premier Ernie Eves's energy minister, then Greenpeace climate campaigner Josh Matlow caught Mr. Baird partying at a "very chummy shrimp-and-wine gathering" with the Canadian Coalition for Responsible Environmental Solutions - an industry group opposed to the Kyoto Protocol. And, during that October 2002 gathering, Minister Baird reportedly made an "anti-Kyoto rallying cry. Needless to say, the audience with very receptive."

Posted by Sean Holman at 09:31 AM
Permanent link

Baird has been installed as Environment Minister because he's better at standing up to critics than Ambrose. The only change to their plan will be louder hot air.

Posted by jj on January 5, 2007 01:16 PM

Will be interesting to see whether or not Darrel Reid survives the change in regime. Having met Mr. Baird a few times he is not likely going to allow a yahoo like Reid to remain as chief of staff in the portfolio.

Actually, the Reid hire was one of the reasons Harper couldn't fire Ambrose completely. He didn't give her the tools or freedom to succeed. Baird has enough sway with the PMO to avoid that kind interference.

Posted by interesting on January 5, 2007 03:17 PM

I've worked under Baird. In my opinion, he's a BULLY.

Posted by experienced on January 5, 2007 04:34 PM

God (or Allah) forbid that anyone would speak against the Kyoto accord. It's received wisdom, like Canada is a peacekeeping nation.

Posted by John Savory on January 5, 2007 04:42 PM

"I've worked under Baird. In my opinion, he's a BULLY"

Apparently an incompetent bully, as he has been sent to environment (which Harper doesn't care about) as punishment for highlighting the Convention-donation-gate scandal before a Senate committee. He didn’t get it was a scandal and Harper didn’t like it being further exposed.

Posted by Walkswithcoffee on January 6, 2007 09:36 AM

Hey Walks. I am no Tory, but your analysis is very Budd-like.

Baird is seriously political and can fight a political battle, even with ridiculously little to back him up.

Ambrose couldn't, and would be a liability going forward in Environment.

Harper may not care about the environment per se, but he sure cares about the politics of the environment and that is why Baird is there.

Posted by gimme on January 6, 2007 09:10 PM

"Baird is seriously political and can fight a political battle, even with ridiculously little to back him up."

That is the nature of bullies, little to back them up, hence why they have to bully.

That is alos the nature of the CPoC five priorities... tax cuts that result in net increases in tax, wait times that go up, child care that isn't, attempting to use the accountability act to make their own illegal books legal... etc etc etc. The CPoC is just bullying the agenda with nadda-net-real thing to back it up.

Where they put a "moving down and out" bully like Baird was a question of putting him were image was best served and where he becomes the most irrelevant (to the CPoC).

Posted by Walkswithcoffee on January 7, 2007 07:38 AM




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

wanted: hearsay & innuendo Site Search

category archives

At the Rockpile
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio

monthly archives

January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004

syndication

RSS 2.0
Atom Feed