Advertisers


October 30, 2006
Making Plans for Nigel

Last week, Premier Gordon Campbell announced all new municipal capital projects receiving provincial funding will have to be reviewed by Partnerships British Columbia if they cost more than $20 million. The reason: perhaps he doesn't think local governments are competent enough to determine whether they need the government-owned company's consultation services? After all, the premier is a big believer in the doctrine of subsidiarity, which states: "It is wrong for a superior body to hold to itself the right to make decisions for which an inferior is already well qualified enough to make for itself.'"

Meanwhile, least one prominent New Democrat is questioning why his party hasn't made more of a ruckus about that announcement. Writes 24 hours's Bill Tieleman, "Surprisingly, the NDP opposition doesn't seem to have grasped the huge significance of Campbell's decision - that's the only way to explain the lack of a news release when one might expect them to scream blue bloody murder."

Posted by Sean Holman at 08:04 AM
Permanent link

Campbell's only giving P3's a helping hand.

Posted by bill on October 30, 2006 09:15 AM

On the one hand Campbell seems to be a big fan of subsidiarity (which sometimes ends up getting used as a euphemism for "downloading"). On the other hand, this announcement is part of a trend by which the Liberals have steadily been eroding local control over matters within local jurisdiction, with legislation like the Private Managed Forest Lands Act, a recent amendment to the BC Utilities Commission Act, and the Significant Projects Streamlining Act. And Campbell's campaign promise to introduce more regional transportation authorities remains unfulfilled, as his government looks at reducing still further the already meagre autonomy of the one such authority in the Lower Mainland.

Posted by obscurantist on October 30, 2006 01:33 PM

Oh yes P3's, what about RAV, Mr. Premier? Isn't it true that the private sector pulled out of the P3 and now that public sector pension plans are being used to fund it? Isn't that a ponsie scheme?

Why did SERCo. bail out of the SNC Lavalin P3?
Why did European Banks refused to lens money for the RAV P3, unless the provincial goverment guarantee the loan? Why would not the banks assume any risk? Yes Mr. Premier why is that?

Posted by Grumpy on October 30, 2006 10:44 PM




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

wanted: hearsay & innuendo Site Search

category archives

Allan Warnke
At the Rockpile
Bob Russell
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio

monthly archives

May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004

syndication

RSS 2.0
Atom Feed