
Earlier, we reported federal Liberal delegate hopefuls wouldn't just be allowed to run in more than one riding. They can also declare their support for different leadership candidates in each of those ridings. But, today, that preliminary policy direction was overturned by the party's national returning officer Remi Bujold. In a letter sent to campaign representatives, deputy national returning officer Nathalie Boulous writes "it is our opinion that if a member has declared his/her support to one Candidate, even if this person is seeking a delegate position in more than one riding, this person should always declare his/her support to the same Candidate." The following is a complete copy of that letter.
September 13, 2006
VIA EMAIL
Lynne Steele on behalf of the Honourable Carolyn Bennett, PC, MP
Jack Siegel on behalf of the Honourable Ken Dryden, PC, MP
Steve RodRozen on behalf of the Honourable Hedy Fry, PC, MP
Quito Maggi on behalf of Martha Hall-Findlay
Sachin Aggarwal on behalf of Michael Ignatieff, MP
Matthew L.O. Certosimo on behalf of the Honourable Bob Rae, PC
Dear all:
Re: Submission to the National Returning Officer on behalf of the Honourable Carolyn Bennett, PC, MP, the Honourable Ken Dryden, PC, MP, the Honourable Hedy Fry, PC, MP, Martha Hall-Findlay, Michael Ignatieff, MP, and the Honourable Bob Rae, PC, in respect of the preliminary direction of the Regional Returning Officer for the Province of British Columbia, Ms Kim Haakstad, dated September 7, 2006, relating to whether delegates can declare their support for different candidates in different affiliated associations.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of your correspondence dated September 11, 2006.
Rule 2.6 (c) authorizes the National Returning Officer “to give directions (consistent with these Rules, the National Constitution and, insofar as it is made applicable by these Rules, the Constitution of any Relevant PTA or Relevant Constitution) on a case by case basis with respect to the conduct of a Regional Returning Officer.
Furthermore, Rule 2.1 allows the Convention Organizing Committee to appoint a Deputy National Returning Officer. The undersigned was duly appoint by the Convention Organizing Committee on or about July 16, 2006.
Furthermore, in accordance with Rule 2.7, the National Returning Officer, the Honourable Rémi Bujold has transferred to the undersigned his full authority from September 6 to the 28th, 2006.
Therefore, we confirm that the undersigned has full authority to review the decision of the Regional Returning Officer for the Province of British Columbia (the “RRO”).
FACTS:
On or about September 5, 2006 at 2:22 PM (Pacific), the RRO issued via an e-mail titled “Important Information” a direction relating to a question posed with regards to the Declaration of support.
The question reads as follows :
“Declaration on support – There is nothing in the Rules that seems to prohibit a member seeking election for more than one candidate. The Form 6 asks the member to make an “irrevocable declaration of support” for a candidate. Can a member seek election to support more than one candidate? Could a member seek election from Burnaby-Douglas as Fry Candidate and from Burnaby New Westminster as Bennett Candidate?
Answer [of the RRO]: YES”
DECISION
It appears that the Constitution of the Liberal Party of Party of Canada in British Columbia (the “BC Constitution”), under section 66(3) allows for any member of the LPC to be selected as a delegate as long as this person has been a member in good standing for a period of 42 days immediately preceding the Delegates Election Meeting and has consented in writing to be a delegate.
Therefore, a member seeking a delegate spot, as long as this member respects the abovementioned requirements would be eligible to stand as a delegate according to the BC Constitution.
Furthermore, the Rules of Procedure for the Election of Delegates to the 2006 Leadership and Biennial Convention require from a person seeking to be elected as a delegate to complete and submit a Notice of Intention to Stand (Form 6).
Rule 7.5 provides the following:
Not later than 5:00 p.m., local time, on Friday, September 15, 2006, a person seeking to be a delegate must have provided a complete, signed “Notice of Intention to Stand” in Form 6 to the Regional Returning Officer or to the Local Returning Officer or their designate or, in the case of a person seeking to be a delegate of the Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission from a province or territory, to the Commission Returning Officer or their designate. A Notice of Intention to Stand is not complete unless it includes the printed name, address and telephone number(s), and signature of the delegate candidate and an irrevocable declaration of support for one Leadership Contestant or that he or she wishes to stand for election as an “undeclared” delegate. Delegate candidates may not amend or revoke this declaration after the nomination form has been submitted. [emphasis added].
Can a person make several irrevocable declarations of support?
With respect to the opinion of the RRO, we cannot agree with her position. Despite the fact that a member can stand for election in several ridings in British Columbia, this does not mean that this member can irrevocably declare his/her support to several candidates.
The meaning of the term irrevocable is that it cannot be retracted or revoked.
It is our opinion that if a member has declared his/her support to one Candidate, even if this person is seeking a delegate position in more than one riding, this person should always declare his/her support to the same Candidate. Not doing so, would mean that the person is revoking his/her support to the first Candidate he/she declared his/her support to.
We agree with your position that a declaration of support is irrevocable, and that therefore the first declaration of support made by a delegate candidate cannot subsequently be altered by the submission of any alternative declaration of support. It stands to reason that a delegate candidate cannot possibly declare their support irrevocably for more than one leadership candidate.
We therefore overturn the preliminary direction of the Regional Returning Officer for British Columbia and substitute it by saying that all delegate candidates in the province of British Columbia may declare their support for one leadership candidate only.
Yours very truly,
Nathalie Boulos, B.A., LL.B.,
Deputy National Returning Officer
c. Mike Eizenga
Steve MacKinnon
Kim Haakstad
Mark Grant
Jamie Elmhirst
Patricia Sorbara
All Leadership Campaigns
All Regional Returning Officers
What a stupid idea. If a delegate can't win a spot in his/her own riding, there's something definately wrong with him/her.
And why would such a person be so important as to be able to go to another riding to try and win a seat in another riding which may end up bumping off someone who lives in that other riding and who is part of that Liberal EDA association who because of volunteer work in there should be considered first than the outsider?
I'd say to that outsider wannabe delegate.
"Take a hike. We elect our own people to our delegation."
That's the way it should be.
Elect your own membership in your own riding.
If there are any vacant seats available after all of the delegates have been accounted for and no one else in the riding wants to go, then the
Board approves the outsider to take one.
The worse thing could be all the delegate seats
except one are taken. The last one was one by
an outsider.
Then, the allocation goes to the alternates. But
because of our outsider being able to win a seat
the alternates (one of whom could have won a real
seat) are in-riding people.
In other words, the outsider wins, and bumps off
the local member who could have won a seat into
alternate status.
It's just not good enough to volunteer in helping the local EDA build up itself and help out in the local riding campaign isn't it?
This is stupid. Should be disallowed.
It gives the candidates with the best "machine" multiple votes. A delegate can vote for their candidate after being elected from their own riding, but can also stop members from other ridings from getting elected to support another candidate.
"It gives the candidates with the best "machine" multiple votes. A delegate can vote for their candidate after being elected from their own riding,
This next quote is really cute:
but can also stop members from other ridings from getting elected to support another candidate."
What if that member from another riding is supporting another candidate, but has worked very hard as a volunteer in developing that riding association and campaigns?
Hell, it just doesn't matter to be a good hard working volunteer anymore does it??
Sounds like bullshit to me. One member one vote,
one riding.
How other ridings elect their members is their
own business. The machines watch and hope that
some of their supporters are elected, but democratically.
Ever heard of selling the candidate to the membership without all of the backroom crap?
The basic concept is to sell the candidate to those who have been elected delegates.
Use the KISS principle. Keep it Simple, Stupid.
No wonder the federal Liberals are screwed up.
At the Rockpile
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
Copyright © 2004-2006 Public Eye Mediaworks. Reproductions of any portion of this Website are permitted only with the expressed permission of Public Eye Mediaworks. Public Eye is graciously hosted by TransitionalMedia. Content management services courtesy of Ian King. Layout and graphics courtesy of Art Department Design, Victoria, BC.
This site is powered by Movable Type.