Earlier, we exclusively reported Vivian Smith, a biweekly columnist and summer writing coach at the Times Colonist, had her contract with the newspaper cut short. That decision was delivered a day after tourism industry representatives met with the newspaper's publisher to complain about a column in which Ms. Smith encouraged out-of-towners to explore Victoria's no-charge attraction rather than its more pricey visitor venues. According to Butchart Gardens public relations director Alison Partridge, the publisher "agreed" during the meeting "that (the column) should have never run." And, says Ms. Partridge, Bob McKenzie "did indicate" at the time that Ms. Smith's contract would "probably" be cut short. Mr. McKenzie declined to comment on Ms. Partridge's statements via a representative. But, in an interview with Public Eye, Ms. Smith said "I would once again defend my column on the basis of the facts and fair comment. My idea was to give people alternatives if they want to enjoy this wonderful city." And she added that "if it's true, what (Ms. Partridge) says, it's a sad day for the kind of reporting and fair comment that serves readers best. And that's the kind that's done without fear or favour."
Flower power
July 12, 2006
As a frequent reader of the Times Colonist (as well as this blog) and part-time resident of Vancouver Island I am offended that the editors of the TC sided with their tourist industry advertisers and cut short Vivian Smith's contract.
The high cost of many of the Island's attractions is hardly shocking news. Censorship of a columnist that makes fair comment on that subject is, however, shocking and completely unacceptable in a country where freedom of speech is a constitutional right.
Stifling this kind of reporting is shortsighted. Tourists are delighted to discover that there are a variety of things to do on Vancouver Island that are free. These very same tourists still have to spend money to eat and find accommodation. Depending on their age and tastes, they will lay down some money to visit paid attractions, eat in renowned restaurants, or pamper themselves in day spas.
The only product the TC has to sell is credibility. Note that I said "sell" not "sell out". My trust in the TC's integrity is shaken. It will take years of flawless reporting to remove the cynical skepticism that I will now bring to every edition of the TC.
It is an interesting issue.
If articles about visitting and what to see in Victoria should only be pro-industry, why aren't the articles considered and treated as advertisements?
This is insane.
Clearly newspapers no longer search for truth but search for markets - advertisers clearly rule.
Give me $100, 000.00 and I will build a better alternative - one not focused on mealy-mouthed appeasement of various interest groups but one that goes for the truth, wherever it may lead
Wow, does this mean a health or safety threat can't be reported?
It’s a slippery slope
Is the next step, covering up a flu or Norwalk virus outbreak or toxic spill so the tourism $$ are not impacted?
Frightening