Earlier, we exclusively reported Vivian Smith, a biweekly columnist and summer writing coach at the Times Colonist, had her contract with the newspaper cut short. That decision was delivered a day after tourism industry representatives met with the newspaper's publisher to complain about a column in which Ms. Smith encouraged out-of-towners to explore Victoria's no-charge attraction rather than its more pricey visitor venues. According to Butchart Gardens public relations director Alison Partridge, the publisher "agreed" during the meeting "that (the column) should have never run." And, says Ms. Partridge, Bob McKenzie "did indicate" at the time that Ms. Smith's contract would "probably" be cut short. Mr. McKenzie declined to comment on Ms. Partridge's statements via a representative. But, in an interview with Public Eye, Ms. Smith said "I would once again defend my column on the basis of the facts and fair comment. My idea was to give people alternatives if they want to enjoy this wonderful city." And she added that "if it's true, what (Ms. Partridge) says, it's a sad day for the kind of reporting and fair comment that serves readers best. And that's the kind that's done without fear or favour."
Permanent link
As a frequent reader of the Times Colonist (as well as this blog) and part-time resident of Vancouver Island I am offended that the editors of the TC sided with their tourist industry advertisers and cut short Vivian Smith's contract.
The high cost of many of the Island's attractions is hardly shocking news. Censorship of a columnist that makes fair comment on that subject is, however, shocking and completely unacceptable in a country where freedom of speech is a constitutional right.
Stifling this kind of reporting is shortsighted. Tourists are delighted to discover that there are a variety of things to do on Vancouver Island that are free. These very same tourists still have to spend money to eat and find accommodation. Depending on their age and tastes, they will lay down some money to visit paid attractions, eat in renowned restaurants, or pamper themselves in day spas.
The only product the TC has to sell is credibility. Note that I said "sell" not "sell out". My trust in the TC's integrity is shaken. It will take years of flawless reporting to remove the cynical skepticism that I will now bring to every edition of the TC.
It is an interesting issue.
If articles about visitting and what to see in Victoria should only be pro-industry, why aren't the articles considered and treated as advertisements?
This is insane.
Clearly newspapers no longer search for truth but search for markets - advertisers clearly rule.
Give me $100, 000.00 and I will build a better alternative - one not focused on mealy-mouthed appeasement of various interest groups but one that goes for the truth, wherever it may lead
Wow, does this mean a health or safety threat can't be reported?
It’s a slippery slope
Is the next step, covering up a flu or Norwalk virus outbreak or toxic spill so the tourism $$ are not impacted?
Frightening
Allan Warnke
At the Rockpile
Bob Russell
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
Copyright © 2004-2006 Public Eye Mediaworks. Reproductions of any portion of this Website are permitted only with the expressed permission of Public Eye Mediaworks. Public Eye is graciously hosted by TransitionalMedia. Content management services courtesy of Ian King. Layout and graphics courtesy of Art Department Design, Victoria, BC.
This site is powered by Movable Type.