Advertisers


January 31, 2006
A letter from home

It looks like columnists Bill Tieleman and Paul Willcocks aren't the only members of the chattering classes to take a dim view of provincial Liberal supporter Louise Burgart's appointment to the electoral boundary commission. From Dave Paulson, managing editor of Prince George Citizen, comes word that his broadsheet - the largest daily newspaper in New Democrat leader Carole James's old stomping grounds - has also come out against Ms. Burgart. In his editorial, which was published last week, Mr. Paulson writes "Whether Burgart could park her Liberal loyalties while working on the commission isn't the issue. Transparency is. To maintain the commission's integrity and ensure public confidence in a critical process, Burgart must be replaced." The following is a complete copy of that editorial.

As one of three members appointed to the province's electoral boundaries commission, Fort St. James resident Louise Burgart has a hand in redrawing the map of B.C.'s constituencies.

The commission, as specified in the Electoral Boundaries Commission Act, must be comprised of a judge or retired judge (Justice Bruce Cohen), B.C.'s chief electoral officer (Harry Neufeld) and "a person who is not a member of the legislative assembly or an employee of the government and who is nominated by the Speaker of the legislative assembly, after consultation with the premier and the leader of the Official Opposition," as stated in the Act.

Louise Burgart is the third appointee.

Oh, and the commission members are to be non-partisan; that is, they are to have no affiliation with any political party.

This should have eliminated Burgart from consideration.

Certainly she could provide valuable knowledge to the commission. Burgart is a former superintendent of the Nechako-Lakes school district, was a longtime member of the B.C. College of Teachers, is a businesswoman and as a northerner is sensitive to the realities of sprawling hinterland ridings versus urban ones.

However, she is also an active and enthusiastic supporter of the B.C. Liberal party.

As disclosed by Sean Holman on his political website Public Eye Online, Burgart's family's company, which owns Apex Alpine ski resort near Penticton, donated $1,400 to the Liberals in 1998 and another $1,500 in 2004. She also worked on the campaign to elect Prince George-Omineca MLA John Rustad, and a letter to the editor by Burgart which praised the B.C. Liberals was published in The Citizen shortly before last May's provincial election.

Penticton-Okanagan MLA Bill Barisoff, as Speaker of the House, nominated Burgart for the electoral boundaries commission. To compound the situation, the Apex ski resort Burgart owns is in Barisoff's riding and the company donated $1,000 to Barisoff's campaign in 2001, Holman writes.

Given the extremely sensitive nature of the electoral boundaries commission, Burgart is clearly an unsuitable choice despite NDP leader Carole James' approval (they've known each other since James' days as head of the provincial school trustees association). It appears the NDP didn't bother to check Burgart's background before giving its OK.

Charged with the responsibility of recommending boundary changes to B.C. ridings, the public must have every assurance the commission is acting without a shred of self-interest. A non-partisan commission is essential to prevent the perception of gerrymandering, the altering of boundaries to deliberately favour one party.

Whether Burgart could park her Liberal loyalties while working on the commission isn't the issue. Transparency is.

To maintain the commission's integrity and ensure public confidence in a critical process, Burgart must be replaced.

Posted by Sean Holman at 04:54 PM
Permanent link

If Burgart resigns, Mr. Holman, I'm going to hold you as the man responsible.

(Good show mab!)

Posted by David M. on January 31, 2006 05:53 PM

Wow. If she resigns it would be because even she may understand the partisan connection makes the job being not worth it . If so many folks are against her appointment and Public Eye reports it why in God's name would anyone expect him to be the one responsible for her leaving?

Posted by DL on January 31, 2006 06:25 PM

I think I have may have changed my earlier position. If the BC North is so willing to piss away any chance of a voice as they had with Burgart like editor Dave Paulson just did, who am I to question the wisdom of Carole James for past supporting her.

Lets bring back Houle to finish off the job of screwing rural BC over, evidently they like it that way and it makes Holman happy.

All good things where I stand. Can we blame Farnworth for this ?

Posted by Kevin Larsen on January 31, 2006 07:03 PM

I really don't know how someone can conclude that only Louise Burghart can understand rural needs. Surely, any competent geographer or social science instructor at any one of several Interior, Up Island or Northern community colleges or Universities could serve with distinction on this commission and articulate rural needs based on research and data rather than just political rhetoric.

It must come as a surprise to Burghart and Barisoff that the Prince George Citizen would editorialize against her. From my experience living in Prince George in the 1970s, the Citizen's editorial posture was 100% pure Social Credit. The local SC candidate of the day, Howard Lloyd, was given worshipful coverage, till the party changed its mind on orders from Premier Bill Bennett and wanted to sideline him, and then the Citizen treated him like mud. It was that kind of total loyalty to the party. Things must have changed for them to now suggest that the party, now called the BC Liberals instead of BC Social Credit, needs to straighten up a little.

Posted by Budd Campbell on January 31, 2006 08:02 PM

Therein lies the problem Budd, most any competent person could understand rural and geographical needs, however this previous Houle appointee clearly failed in that area and actually ignored some 37 submissions in one case and screwed over a section of rural BC in the process. But who really cares anyway, its all who you vote for and who you donate to. Are the other two appointees on this commission banned from voting?

Posted by Kevin Larsen on January 31, 2006 10:13 PM




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

wanted: hearsay & innuendo Site Search

category archives

At the Rockpile
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio

monthly archives

December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004

syndication

RSS 2.0
Atom Feed