Advertisers


December 11, 2005
A guide to Liberal policy

If toeing the party line was a competitive sport, South Surrey-White Rock-Cloverdale federal Liberal hopeful Jim McMurtry appears to be in training to become an Olympic champion. In a telephone interview, the former New Democrat candidate revealed when he's "out on the hustings, I'm not representing Jim McMurtry. I'm representing my riding association." An example: during his pre-acclamation interview with association executives, the candidate told us he was asked how he felt about the Gomery Commission. "And I said, 'Well, I'd like to sit down and hear what you people think about Gomery. But I can tell you right now how I feel. I think it was wrong." But, while campaigning, he said "my view on Gomery would be - and I'm just going to page 26 (of the campaign briefing book) - based on what is said there, that the party has accepted responsibility all the way."

And what's your opinion on campaign finance reform, we inquired? After all, as a New Democrat, Mr. McMurtry slammed the law limiting union donations to $1,000 - saying it was leaving party hopefuls on the hook for campaign expenses. In fact, that's the reason he gave for dropping out of the election in 2004 - about a week after being acclaimed as the left-wing party's candidate in Surrey North.

"I don't know what I would say. If you gave me another week on this. Right now I'm just running around. This afternoon I have to get photos in and we're doing a doorknocker and all that kind of stuff. But I don't believe I'm going into this election representing Jim McMurtry," responded the candidate.

Personally, he said there should be limits on donations: "I don't think your average Canadian likes the idea that certain people can buy inordinate influence in the political process. But where does one draw the line? Well, these are complicated questions. And I don't know if I have ever really thought about it. Having not read Bill C-24, I just knew how people were telling me it was affecting me" - specifically, the local New Democrats who asked him to open a $5,000 personal line of credit because they couldn't get enough campaign financing from the labour movement.

Then, turning his attention back to his briefing book, Mr. McMurtry added "I don't know the index here. I can't find (the Liberal policy) very quickly. It doesn't seem to be a talking point."

During the almost hour-long interview, the candidate also explained why he switched parties. When the New Democrats asked him to open a line of credit, the 46-year-old Mr. McMurtry said he gave his father, former Ontario Tory attorney general Roy McMurtry, a phone call. "And I was saying, 'Dad, you know, this is really very unattractive to me.' And he was very forthright in saying, 'You should have nothing to do with them whatsoever.' And I said, 'Dad, I don't want to let people down.' And he said, 'They've let you down. And it's not in your interest.' And ever since he's said to me...I really have to end up finding a way of getting with a more established party."

So it was a practical consideration, joining the Liberals? "It began that way. But the more I think about it - if you knew how I ran my own household, you know, I'm very responsible I think. I have almost no debt and no mortgage. So I'm kind of an odd bird. My wife and I - for the first six years of three children - we didn't have a car."

Mr. McMurtry then said he thinks that kind of fiscal restraint - which he says is shared by the Martin administration - is important for the country. "And I know that there's people in the Liberal party who see the world in the same way. So I think I have found a home." A version of this article will be published in tomorrow's edition of 24 hours.

Posted by Sean Holman at 11:23 PM
Permanent link

It's kind of hard to accept that this guy is actually Roy McMurtry's son. What on earth does the kid do in terms of a day job?

Posted by Budd Campbell on December 12, 2005 10:24 AM

He was Surrey's 2004 Teacher of the Year.

Posted by Linda on December 12, 2005 11:43 AM

Too freaky.

Posted by Dagmar on December 12, 2005 02:05 PM

Just sounds like a rookie politician trying his best to stay on message.

Posted by david on December 12, 2005 02:33 PM

"Just sounds like a rookie politician trying his best to stay on message."

Agreed, David, but that's my point. This guy really doesn't come across as a chip off the McMurtry block. Instead, you'd think he was the first member of his family ever to be exposed to politics and running for office.


Posted by Budd Campbell on December 12, 2005 03:07 PM

Looks like the fed libs aren't seriously contesting S. Surrey - White Rock.

Seems like a keeper riding for the Tories.

Posted by Rick on December 12, 2005 03:14 PM

He sounds like a really nice guy who just doesn't know what he's doing. That's excuse most of the barking Liberal seals seem to have. Decent human beings, just no clue what they've gotten themselves into.

Posted by Andrew McVie on December 12, 2005 03:38 PM

Obviously McMurtry didn't know who or what he was really talking to.
Lo que?

Posted by Joseph Eaton on December 12, 2005 03:51 PM


Andrew, you have changed... previously the Liberals were evil but now they are good people, just misguided. Congrats on the move.

Now,can you address issues were you think they are misguided (without the blind partisan attacks - you would be on the right track with that approach)

Posted by Eugene Parks on December 13, 2005 12:34 PM




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

wanted: hearsay & innuendo Site Search

category archives

At the Rockpile
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio

monthly archives

December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004

syndication

RSS 2.0
Atom Feed