A historical footnote

As has been already been reported far and wide, provincial New Democrat conventioneers had a lot to say last night about party leader Carole James's earlier support for a MLA pay raise. But Ms. James wasn't nearly as talkative about that support when she addressed those delegates earlier this morning: "Last week, when we made a mistake, you spoke up. You told us we were wrong. And you were right. But we cannot allow it to overshadow our incredible success." Full stop.

In a scrum following that address, The Vancouver Sun's Vaughn Palmer asked Ms. James why she thought her "glancing, half-sentence reference (to the controversy) was a sufficient way to deal with the furor over the wage increases?"

Answered the leader, "Because of the fact we had a very good discussion last night. A good opportunity for people to raise their issues. I think it was important to mention it again today. But yes, I've had delegate after delegate come up to say they're pleased with the way we've handled it. Their pleased with that we had an open opportunity for debate last night."

"You didn't really mention it though...you didn't say what (the mistake) was. You just said you made a mistake," commented BCTV/Global's Keith Baldrey. "I don't think there's a person in this province (who) doesn't know what's gone on in the past five years," responded Ms. James.

But what about this line that the mistake should not "overshadow (caucus's) incredible success?" Doesn't that sound like something out of Premier Gordon Campbell's oft-mocked robotic "moving forward" message box, which focuses future successes rather than past mistakes? "Not at all. In fact, we stood up and said, 'We made a mistake.' We acknowledged and fixed it. If we'd seen the Campbell government admit mistakes we wouldn't be dealing with things like child deaths that we've been dealing with in the past six months."

2 Comments

Pay raises can be dealt with like this.

Legislative votes on MLA raises do not take affect until after the next election. Policy position: No sitting of the legislature votes on its own salary... only the next sitting.

What so tough to figure out here?

and some folks wonder why most party members of any party shun conventions at all cost. The head table drived the agenda anywhere it wishes to have it go.

James and Co. screwed up, the rank and file let her know it really quickly and luckily some of her handlers did the right thing and got her to backtrack. Why poiticians seem to think the only ones with brains are themselves. So now we will have to just guess who in the caucus spoke against the stupid move in the first place. The party of the little guy ended up with much egg on face and won't be trusted soon by a lot of the rank and file no matter how many standing ovations come out of a convention. I'm sure some of them must have had the intelligence to say. Hey Boss, it is plainly wrong so get a grip. But let's face it the leader gets to pick who does what so it can be pretty intimidating to cross swords. The donation amounts will tell the real story.

Leave a comment

Copyright © 2004 - Public Eye Mediaworks. Reproductions of any portion of this Website are permitted only with the expressed permission of Public Eye Mediaworks.
Canadian Web Hosting graciously provided by dotcanuck Web Services. Layout and graphics courtesy of Art Department Design.