Advertisers


October 26, 2005
Surrender monkeys

Earlier, Public Eye reported rumours the British Columbia New Democrat's provincial council would, this weekend, "discuss a last-minute compromise proposal" concerning the party's relationship with the labour movement. And now, your humble organ has obtained a copy of that proposal. According to the document, unions will still be permitted to affiliate with the New Democrats. But the number of delegates they send to convention will be calculated according to the total number of individual party members belonging to that union - not the union's total membership, as is presently the case. That will likely reduce the number of labour movement delegates at convention - although not as dramatically as the affiliation committee's majority report had initially recommended. Suprisingly, the proposal also increases the number of labour representatives on provincial council for four to six - a recommendation also contained in the majority report. The following is a copy of that proposal.

Proposal on Affiliation

Significant debate has ensued since the September Provincial Council meeting regarding the report of the Committee on Affiliation. What follows here is a model which has received considerable support during those discussions, enough to warrant consideration formally by the Provincial Executive for possible recommendation to the Provincial Council and ultimately to Provincial Convention. While asserting the principle of individual members being the fundamental building block of the party, the model acknowledges the historic and ongoing importance of Labour�s participation.

* An individual may choose to join the BC NDP as an affiliated member by indicating their involvement or membership in an affiliated organization.
* All affiliated members shall be individual BC NDP members in good standing.
* Affiliated members of the BC NDP shall participate in party decision making as members of the constituency association where they reside (unless their membership is transferred to another constituency in accordance with the constitution) with the exception of selecting delegates to convention.
* For the purposes of selecting delegates to convention, affiliated members will only participate through their affiliated organization, including calculation of delegate entitlement, standing for nomination as delegate to convention, and voting for delegates to convention.
* Calculation of delegate credential entitlement will be based upon the following:
* For an affiliated union, whether that affiliation is through the union�s local, provincial or national office, delegate entitlement will be calculated by aggregating all affiliated individual members from all affiliated locals of the union or through regionally based organizations as approved by Provincial Executive.
* For other affiliated organizations, affiliated local organizations will aggregate their total affiliated individual memberships with like organizations province wide or through regionally based organizations as approved by Provincial Executive.
* The same formula used to determine constituency entitlement will be used to determine delegate entitlement for these aggregations.
* The position of a labour Vice-President and labour member-at-large on the Provincial Executive be retained (as is the current practice), and that six (instead of four) labour representatives be on the Provincial Council, all to be elected by the labour caucus at the Provincial Convention.

Below are suggested draft amendments to the BC NDP Constitution that reflect the model as outlined.

Posted by Sean Holman at 04:31 PM
Permanent link

Ah yes... The (in)famous 'More-is-Less' solution...
or is it the 'Less-is-More' solution?

I think I'll call it the 'less-or-more' proposal...
That would more or less fit into a congruent's convention.

Posted by Global Village Idiot on October 26, 2005 11:34 PM

This proposal, if accepted, would effectively end the controversy. All memberships would in reality be individual memberships.

Posted by Budd Campbell on October 27, 2005 08:13 AM

Budd, this would end the "special power" situation that currently adheres to union affiliation, which is good news from a leadership/policy/convention point of view. It will not end the "special relationship", which is bad news from a winning elections point of view. As long as union affiliation exists in any form, even this proposed zero-sum form, the Liberals will be able to beat the NDP over the head with it at four year intervals.

Posted by Not Over Until It is Over on October 27, 2005 08:51 AM

Yeah, well, it's done as a serious internal issue. Unless, of course, CUPE and Steel decide that this too is completely unacceptable and decide to make this a head-on collision situation.

Posted by Budd Campbell on October 27, 2005 10:21 AM

Unions automatically getting six members on the NDP Party executive is still absolutely outrageous as far as I'm concerned.

Posted by Jerry on October 27, 2005 02:21 PM

Who cares, realy, anyway. Now that the party has a sizeable caucus, the internal party workings really cease to be important anyway. I've got no problem with 6 union reps on the Provincial Executive. Generally, the only people on the party exec that make any sense at all come from unions.

Posted by not bad on October 27, 2005 03:06 PM

Unions automatically getting six members on the NDP Party executive is still absolutely outrageous as far as I'm concerned.

Posted by Jerry at October 27, 2005 02:21 PM

Fine Jerry. You're outraged, I'm not. Not to waste too much time, but can you say why you're outraged?

Posted by Budd Campbell on October 27, 2005 04:04 PM




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

wanted: hearsay & innuendo Site Search

category archives

Allan Warnke
At the Rockpile
Bob Russell
Broken News
Creatures of Government
Fighting Words
From the Gallery
Letter from the Editor
Loose Lips
Off the Hill
Public Eye Radio

monthly archives

June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004

syndication

RSS 2.0
Atom Feed